Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs HPE Integrity NonStop comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS E-Series Servers and HPE Integrity NonStop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive, they are quite pricey."
  • "The pricing of the solution is reasonable. From a commercial point of view, the prices are okay."
  • "There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution. The most expensive server from Cisco is Cisco UCS B-Series."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The product is expensive."
  • More Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability.
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:The platform's pricing needs improvement. There could be more collaborative tools included.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    11th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    269
    Comparisons
    88
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    8.0
    17th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    122
    Comparisons
    43
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UCS E-Series Servers
    Integrity NonStop, HP Integrity NonStop
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are next-generation, power-optimized, x86, Intel Xeon 64-bit blade servers designed to be deployed in Cisco Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2) and the Cisco 4451-X ISR. These price-to-performance-optimized single-socket blade servers balance simplicity, performance, reliability, and power efficiency. They are well suited for applications and infrastructure services typically deployed in small offices and branch offices.

    HPE NonStop systems are designed from the ground up for mission-critical environments that demand continuous business and 100% fault tolerance. NonStop eliminates the risk of downtime while meeting large scale business needs, online transaction processing and database requirements. The NonStop software environment is also available for use in private clouds.

    Sample Customers
    Navaho,  MiroNet AG, Columbia Sportswear
    Pella, Octo Telematics
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is ranked 11th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews while HPE Integrity NonStop is ranked 17th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is rated 8.0, while HPE Integrity NonStop is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS E-Series Servers writes "Easy to configure and operate". On the other hand, Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Synergy, whereas HPE Integrity NonStop is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.