Compare Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. NEC Sigmablade-M

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use NEC Sigmablade-M? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's expensive, they are quite pricey."

More Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
59
Comparisons
18
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
976
Avg. Rating
9.0
16th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
83
Comparisons
54
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
UCS E-Series ServersSigmablade-M
Learn
Cisco
NEC
Overview

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are next-generation, power-optimized, x86, Intel Xeon 64-bit blade servers designed to be deployed in Cisco Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2) and the Cisco 4451-X ISR. These price-to-performance-optimized single-socket blade servers balance simplicity, performance, reliability, and power efficiency. They are well suited for applications and infrastructure services typically deployed in small offices and branch offices.

The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers
Learn more about NEC Sigmablade-M
Sample Customers
Navaho,  MiroNet AG, Columbia SportswearSysmex Shanghai
Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 1 review while NEC Sigmablade-M is ranked 16th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is rated 9.0, while NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS E-Series Servers writes "Reliable, efficient, and easy to set up". On the other hand, Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is most compared with , whereas NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.