• Home
  • Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs. NEC Sigmablade-M

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers vs NEC Sigmablade-M comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo

Cisco UCS E-Series Servers

Read 7 Cisco UCS E-Series Servers reviews
263 views|91 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
NEC Logo

NEC Sigmablade-M

44 views|37 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS E-Series Servers and NEC Sigmablade-M based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Muhammad Noman Rajput
Easy to configure and operate
If you provide the high-end skill and high-end bandwidth for this single port it will be more beneficial for that customer. The high-end traffic is... Read more →
Use NEC Sigmablade-M?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's expensive, they are quite pricey."
  • "The pricing of the solution is reasonable. From a commercial point of view, the prices are okay."
  • "There is a need to pay towards the licensing costs of the solution. The most expensive server from Cisco is Cisco UCS B-Series."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The product is expensive."

    • More Cisco UCS E-Series Servers Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?
    Top Answer:The product's most valuable features are stability, speed, and scalability.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS E-Serie...
    Top Answer:The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a five out of ten.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Cisco UCS E-Series Servers?
    Top Answer:The platform's pricing needs improvement. There could be more collaborative tools included.
    Read all 6 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    11th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    263
    Comparisons
    91
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    339
    Rating
    8.0
    20th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    44
    Comparisons
    37
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UCS E-Series Servers
    Sigmablade-M
    Learn More
    Cisco
    NEC
    Overview

    Cisco UCS E-Series Servers are next-generation, power-optimized, x86, Intel Xeon 64-bit blade servers designed to be deployed in Cisco Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2) and the Cisco 4451-X ISR. These price-to-performance-optimized single-socket blade servers balance simplicity, performance, reliability, and power efficiency. They are well suited for applications and infrastructure services typically deployed in small offices and branch offices.

    The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

    Sample Customers
    Navaho,  MiroNet AG, Columbia Sportswear
    Sysmex Shanghai
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is ranked 11th in Blade Servers with 7 reviews while NEC Sigmablade-M is ranked 20th in Blade Servers. Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is rated 8.0, while NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS E-Series Servers writes "Easy to configure and operate". On the other hand, Cisco UCS E-Series Servers is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.