We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS Manager and ManageEngine IT360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Cisco UCS Manager is overall a good package because it gives a GUI interface and a CLI."
"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."
"The most valuable features are flexibility and management."
"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."
"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."
"From a usability and functionality perspective, Cisco UCS Manager is very good."
"The flexibility and the ease in which the features can be expanded are the solution's most valuable aspects."
"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."
"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."
"The technical support is good."
"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."
"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to their security."
"I found it a bit of a challenge to get training on UCSM. I've been trying to get that for some time now. I feel like I have to figure it out a lot of things myself. For years I've to log calls with support whenever I've got challenges that I cannot resolve. If I had some training or more manuals, I'd be better able to handle more things on my own."
"The installation and upgrade sytems need to be improved."
"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."
"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."
"Upgrading the firmware is a difficult procedure."
"There is room for improvement in the software part of Cisco UCS Manager. It should be more user-friendly, especially when creating policies."
"The pricing can be better."
"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."
"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."
"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."
Earn 20 points
Cisco UCS Manager is ranked 30th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 21 reviews while ManageEngine IT360 is ranked 70th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Cisco UCS Manager is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine IT360 is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco UCS Manager writes "Stable and resilient, but slightly more complicated to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine IT360 writes "Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy". Cisco UCS Manager is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Nutanix Prism, HPE OneView, Zabbix and Datadog, whereas ManageEngine IT360 is most compared with StackPath Monitoring, eG Enterprise and HPE OneView.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
