Compare Cisco Umbrella vs. Perimeter 81

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Umbrella Logo
35,611 views|26,784 comparisons
Perimeter 81 Logo
640 views|517 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The core business of Cisco Umbrella is non-malware. That's all it does: block the malware on the gateway.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability.""Using this solution has meant that we've needed to make fewer firewall changes.""The most valuable feature is that it secures our network against blacklisted or malicious websites.""The most valuable features are the protection against ransomware and phishing.""It will protect, give you more robustness, and faster responses, compared to any firewalls or any of the proxy web servers.""The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.""It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy."

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

"Their split tunneling feature has been very valuable to our company since implementing the Perimeter 81 solution."

More Perimeter 81 Pros »

Cons
"The solution's technical support is not very good.""Security, overall, can always be improved.""I would like to see DLP integration in the next release of this solution.""Support for multiple domains is important to us.""I would like to see a graphical representation of the entire network.""It would be useful if they had a malware protection engine running inside their own VM.""This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.""I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future."

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."

More Perimeter 81 Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."

More Perimeter 81 Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions are best for your needs.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
35,611
Comparisons
26,784
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
608
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
640
Comparisons
517
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
433
Avg. Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
OpenDNS
Learn
Cisco
Perimeter 81
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Perimeter 81 is a Zero Trust Network as a Service helping organizations to secure their network, cloud and application access, and protect their most valuable resources. Incorporating the highest standards of Zero Trust Security, Perimeter 81 seamlessly applies adaptive policies, based on device, identity and location, so that only authorized users are granted access to critical corporate resources. A pioneer in software-defined access technology, Perimeter 81 is among the first solution that can fully secure access to both managed and unmanaged devices. Unlike traditional hardware-based network security providers, Perimeter 81 provides greater network visibility, seamless on-boarding and automatic integration with all the major cloud providers. Furthermore, the solution can be fully deployed across a company’s network in less than 15 minutes, giving companies of all industries and sizes the power to be securely mobile and completely cloud-confident.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Perimeter 81
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaimAqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Consumer Goods Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company26%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company14%
Non Profit6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise39%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise61%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Palo Alto Networks and others in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE). Updated: November 2020.
448,896 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco Umbrella is ranked 1st in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 21 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 10th in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) with 1 review. Cisco Umbrella is rated 8.8, while Perimeter 81 is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Umbrella writes "Offers protection from DNS-based attacks and improves visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Affordable, secure, and allows me to manage all user access in one platform". Cisco Umbrella is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Cloud App Security and Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato Networks, AppGate and Cloudflare Access.

See our list of best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors.

We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.