Cisco Wireless WAN vs Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN.
To learn more, read our detailed Wireless WAN Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is very expensive."
  • "Cisco is more expensive than other solutions."
  • "This is a very expensive solution but there are no additional costs."
  • "It was a one time fee and there are no costs in addition to this."
  • "There is a license that is needed for the use of this solution."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • "The pricing is based on how much is ordered from the vendor and what type of discount they receive."
  • "If you have a two-person team doing the physical access point installations, they should be able to set up 10 to 20 access points per day."
  • More Cisco Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 10 in Wireless WAN
    Views
    2,755
    Comparisons
    451
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    361
    Rating
    8.2
    Unranked
    In Wireless WAN
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Wireless WAN refers to the wireless networking solutions provided by Cisco Systems, a leading technology company specializing in networking and communication products. Cisco Wireless WAN enables organizations to establish wireless connections and extend their wide area network (WAN) connectivity using cellular networks.

    Cisco Wireless WAN solutions leverage cellular technologies, such as 4G LTE and 5G, to provide high-speed and reliable wireless connectivity. These solutions offer a range of features and capabilities that enhance network performance, security, and manageability.

    Cisco Wireless WAN Features & Benefits:

    • Enhanced Connectivity: Enables wireless connections over cellular networks for areas with limited wired connectivity.
    • High-Speed Data Transfer: Delivers fast data transfer rates for efficient file transmission and real-time collaboration.
    • Increased Mobility: Extends network connectivity to mobile devices and remote locations.
    • Reliable and Resilient Connectivity: Ensures reliable and uninterrupted connectivity with intelligent routing and failover capabilities.
    • Security and Data Protection: Integrates robust security features to safeguard data transmitted over the wireless network.
    • Centralized Management: Provides centralized control and visibility through management platforms like Cisco DNA Center and Cisco Meraki Dashboard.
    • Integration with Cisco Ecosystem: Seamlessly integrates with other Cisco networking solutions for a comprehensive network infrastructure.
    • Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing connectivity needs without compromising performance.
    • Application Optimization: Prioritizes critical applications and optimizes traffic for improved performance.
    • Industry Compatibility: Suitable for various industries, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

    Cisco Wireless WAN empowers organizations with reliable, secure, and scalable wireless connectivity, enabling mobility and enhancing network performance and productivity.

    Reviews from Real Users

    PeerSpot user, Manager - Technology at a tech services company, states that "Recently, the most valuable and in-demand feature that users are enjoying is WiFi 6 support on the access points. The other good thing about Cisco Wireless LAN is how easily it provides clean access to the WiFi network."

    Muhammad Alim Besari, Solution Architect at Packet System Indonesia, says that “Cisco Wireless LAN deliver the best wireless experience yet so easy to operate and manage.”

    Zulfiqar Saeed, SE at The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, writes that "The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless WAN are its security functionality. We have a lab environment and we have to provide different authentications to the users which are easy to manage. Additionally, there is a lot of useful automation embedded into the system."

    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
    Western United States County Water Department
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization15%
    Government12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company89%
    Educational Organization1%
    Manufacturing Company1%
    Comms Service Provider1%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business4%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise94%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Wireless WAN
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 60 reviews while Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Wireless WAN. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] writes "Great for hospitals as the main hospital is usually the hub of many smaller buildings and also the tallest building in the neighborhood". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.