Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ruckus Wireless WAN comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
2,706 views|432 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Ruckus Logo
7,122 views|5,638 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a small feature, but Cisco allows me to see access points with blinking lights. This shows me which access point is which.""The most valuable feature of Cisco Wireless WAN is the ease of management.""This is the most stable product in the market.""Cisco Wireless WAN's most valuable feature is it is robust.""The most valuable features for me are the ease of operation and scalability.""The most valuable feature is the ease of configuration.""I am impressed with the tool's packet tracing so that connection with the devices is always consistent.""We have found that the product scales well."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point.""The strongest point for Ruckus has always been the radio hardware.""The most valuable solution is its simplicity. The solution is simple and easy to use.""The connectivity is good. There's no lag at all in service.""Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it.""The initial setup of Ruckus Wireless WAN is very easy.""Radio management is a valuable feature of the solution.""The connectivity, speed, and reliability are very good."

More Ruckus Wireless WAN Pros →

Cons
"The tool's speed and IP address acquisition from the domain controller should be improved""The price could be better.""The support of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.""The price could be better.""Pricing is very high with Cisco products. It's something that many people complain about. They should work to make it more affordable.""The price of Cisco Wireless WAN could improve, it is expensive.""The integration support technology should be improved.""There are limitations on the SSIDs that could improve. We cannot enable two ways of authenticating users on one SSID. For a number of places, we have to provide different modes of certification for the user which requires us to create another SSID for the broadcast."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Cons →

"The solution needs to offer more analytics.""There is a significant issue with wireless functionality in Apple devices, particularly during video calls.""Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials.""The captive portal should be more customizable because right now, it is very limited.""The documentation they do have is very difficult to understand. There should be some scenarios, deployments, complications, or techniques to follow. They are inadequate in that regard, and the documentation needs to be greatly improved.""I would like to have a better built-in reporting feature.""What needs improvement in Ruckus Wireless WAN is the initial setup. It could be easier. Availability is also another area for improvement in the product. Another huge disadvantage of Ruckus Wireless WAN is the cost you must continuously pay for the licenses.""In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."

More Ruckus Wireless WAN Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is very expensive."
  • "Cisco is more expensive than other solutions."
  • "This is a very expensive solution but there are no additional costs."
  • "It was a one time fee and there are no costs in addition to this."
  • "There is a license that is needed for the use of this solution."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • "The pricing is based on how much is ordered from the vendor and what type of discount they receive."
  • "If you have a two-person team doing the physical access point installations, they should be able to set up 10 to 20 access points per day."
  • More Cisco Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution is a little pricey, so customers sometimes select other products because of the price."
  • "This solution offers a yearly subscription. The price is not high, other solutions are much higher than Ruckus."
  • "This is a wonderful product for the price."
  • "It's expensive but you get more coverage."
  • "Here in India, Ruckus is chosen often because it is priced low."
  • "Licensing for Ruckus Wireless WAN when you compare it to other vendors, it's on par and not expensive. For me, all licensing is expensive by default, but you do get lifelong licenses, and what's cool about it is the license for Ruckus Wireless WAN, especially on the LAN controller, is not linked to an access point. It's just a quantity access point deployment, so you can rip out old APs, and put new ones in and they'll work on the wireless LAN because the license is not linked to a specific access point which is much easier to work with."
  • "In terms of the license of Ruckus Wireless WAN being cheap or expensive, it would differ based on your country. As I'm living in Turkey, it's expensive, so far. There is a big challenge about the chip crisis or the silicon crisis lately, and all vendors are fighting, so not enough equipment could be sold and the vendors must earn money, so it's very fair for vendors to push software and licensing to keep working and earning, so it's hard to answer a question on how cheap or expensive the license is for the solution."
  • "The price of Ruckus Wireless WAN is in the middle price range compared to competitors. You will find Cisco is the most expensive, the second is HPE and Aruba, and the third is Ruckus Wireless WAN. You then have all the follower solutions."
  • More Ruckus Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is very… more »
    Top Answer:Ruckus Wireless WAN is an easy-to-use solution.
    Top Answer:On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 10 in Wireless WAN
    Views
    2,706
    Comparisons
    432
    Reviews
    38
    Average Words per Review
    361
    Rating
    8.2
    2nd
    out of 10 in Wireless WAN
    Views
    7,122
    Comparisons
    5,638
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    530
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cisco Wireless WAN refers to the wireless networking solutions provided by Cisco Systems, a leading technology company specializing in networking and communication products. Cisco Wireless WAN enables organizations to establish wireless connections and extend their wide area network (WAN) connectivity using cellular networks.

    Cisco Wireless WAN solutions leverage cellular technologies, such as 4G LTE and 5G, to provide high-speed and reliable wireless connectivity. These solutions offer a range of features and capabilities that enhance network performance, security, and manageability.

    Cisco Wireless WAN Features & Benefits:

    • Enhanced Connectivity: Enables wireless connections over cellular networks for areas with limited wired connectivity.
    • High-Speed Data Transfer: Delivers fast data transfer rates for efficient file transmission and real-time collaboration.
    • Increased Mobility: Extends network connectivity to mobile devices and remote locations.
    • Reliable and Resilient Connectivity: Ensures reliable and uninterrupted connectivity with intelligent routing and failover capabilities.
    • Security and Data Protection: Integrates robust security features to safeguard data transmitted over the wireless network.
    • Centralized Management: Provides centralized control and visibility through management platforms like Cisco DNA Center and Cisco Meraki Dashboard.
    • Integration with Cisco Ecosystem: Seamlessly integrates with other Cisco networking solutions for a comprehensive network infrastructure.
    • Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing connectivity needs without compromising performance.
    • Application Optimization: Prioritizes critical applications and optimizes traffic for improved performance.
    • Industry Compatibility: Suitable for various industries, including enterprises, service providers, and government agencies.

    Cisco Wireless WAN empowers organizations with reliable, secure, and scalable wireless connectivity, enabling mobility and enhancing network performance and productivity.

    Reviews from Real Users

    PeerSpot user, Manager - Technology at a tech services company, states that "Recently, the most valuable and in-demand feature that users are enjoying is WiFi 6 support on the access points. The other good thing about Cisco Wireless LAN is how easily it provides clean access to the WiFi network."

    Muhammad Alim Besari, Solution Architect at Packet System Indonesia, says that “Cisco Wireless LAN deliver the best wireless experience yet so easy to operate and manage.”

    Zulfiqar Saeed, SE at The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, writes that "The most valuable features of Cisco Wireless WAN are its security functionality. We have a lab environment and we have to provide different authentications to the users which are easy to manage. Additionally, there is a lot of useful automation embedded into the system."

    Ruckus Wireless’s WAN (Wide Area Network) suite of switches and solutions provides companies and organizations with a wide variety of products that enable them to deploy and manage the kinds of WANs that best meet their needs. Ruckus Wireless is a leader in the field of WAN creation, deployment, and management. Their solutions are designed with the user in mind. They are sleek products and solutions that are easy for administrators to use and maintain. This makes it a valuable suite for any and every kind of industry. The level of ease that it provides makes it possible for companies and organizations to reap a high level of benefit from whichever product they choose to use. 

    Ruckus Wireless WAN Benefits

    Some of the benefits of using the Ruckus Wireless WAN suite of switches and solutions include:

    • Simplified network deployment and management. Ruckus Wireless WAN uses Campus Fabric technology to create a streamlined network creation and management process. This technology takes many of the processes used to create and manage networks that usually require many different solutions and combines them so that a single solution can accomplish the same amount of work.
    • The ability to operate on a massive scale. The Ruckus Wireless SmartZone 100 solution gives administrators the power to handle 1,024 access points and 25,000 users from a single device. Companies can operate at a high level with fewer devices than their competitors require to accomplish a similar level of work.
    • Ease of use. Solutions like RuckusZoneDirector 1200 can be easily deployed and used by administrators who may not have a background in the use of wireless solutions. Companies that choose Ruckus Wireless WAN do not need to train administrators to deploy it. This makes it extremely valuable to companies looking to keep their budgets to a minimum. 

    Ruckus Wireless WAN Features

    Organizations that choose to use the Ruckus Wireless WAN suite of switches and solutions have a large number of capabilities from which they can choose. 

    • Centralized network management.  Ruckus Wireless WAN’s RUCKUS Network Director feature enables administrators to manage their networks from a single location. All of the controls and data that users need to monitor and control the network can be managed from one interface.
    • Advanced security features. Ruckus Wireless WAN has the capability to encrypt and demand that traffic that is trying to pass through the network be authenticated before it is allowed access. This protects the data that leaves the network and the network itself.

    • Seamless interoperability. The various solutions and products that make up Ruckus Wireless’s WAN solution suite have the ability to integrate and operate together seamlessly. Users can mix and match solution pieces to best fit their needs.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Ruckus Wireless’s WAN suite is a truly versatile selection of solutions that offer users a complete package of capabilities and features. This suite makes it possible for users to meet all of their networking needs. Their wireless access points are the kind that is mostly employed in industries like resorts, which have to cater to large volumes of people over extended periods of time. They provide companies with the highest possible level of coverage. Users working in any number of fields would find Ruckus Wireless to be up to the task of handling their networking needs. This suite is appropriate for large corporations and small businesses alikes. 

    An information technology project manager at a university writes, “The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful. We get very good coverage from just one access point.  The throughput is very good and the centralized management is excellent.  Also, the ease of deployment is very good.”

    A video conferencing administrator at a technology services company states, “The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses.

    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
    American University of Sharjah, Dordt College, Drew University, Lamar University, Raroa School
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization15%
    Government12%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    University9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company89%
    Educational Organization1%
    Manufacturing Company1%
    Comms Service Provider1%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider33%
    University8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Educational Organization7%
    Construction Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise46%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business4%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise94%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and HPE Wireless WAN. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.

    See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.