We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless and Mojo Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is stable."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The simplicity is great."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) is the ability to troubleshoot ports on the network. Additionally, when there is an update on the APs they are able to reboot quickly reducing downtime. Other solutions have a longer downtime when updates are done."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"Cisco Wireless is easy to use."
"There are a lot of valuable features and functions. One example is CleanAir to detect and troubleshoot interference issues. Another is RX-SOP to optimize roaming."
"The switches can even detect cable issues which quite often can be the main cause for a call-out within my business."
"Cisco's technical support is very good, I've never had an issue with their technical support."
"The product has valuable features for integration and authentication."
"I like that it's a standard wireless solution that can be rolled out throughout the campus. I also like that it is easy to manage. It is a good end-to-end solution."
"Identity PSK helps save SSIDs."
"The ability to make different types of networks, such as land networks, is the most valuable part of the solution."
"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."
"The features that I like the most are the visibility and the firewall, which is very good."
"For support, we do not have to deal with a whole phone menu tree. You get to talk to an engineer right away."
"We can see what the network is being used for or where problems may be."
"We have found Mojo to be critical for us because of its patented security and its wireless intrusion prevention system (WIPS). It is unique in the market."
"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."
"Initial setup was straightforward."
"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The solution is expensive."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The price could be better."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The new licensing has no added value and seems to be Cisco's effort to take advantage of customers."
"There needs to be an access point that is compact and more suitable for small and medium-sized businesses."
"The solution should introduce natural language troubleshooting processes. It will identify possible problems or errors due to the symptoms."
"We use a Cisco product called Room Kit for meetings. It would be nice if Cisco could improve that. I would also like a cloud solution."
"It should be fully compatible with other devices."
"The coverage provided by the solution is an area of concern in some cases, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Their software's really clunky."
"There is a problem with the controller. When we have to restart the controller, it does not show the time. We have to manually configure the time when we restart it. I have read about this issue, to get some information, and all answers are about having to connect it with a time server, which is very difficult."
"The implementation could be simplified. Right now it's a bit complex."
"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."
"The user interface could use improvement, and Mojo is working on it. The features and functions are in two different places, and they are in the process of moving them into one place."
"The RF signalling and data analytics parts should be improved."
"Further expanding the API and access to even more diagnostics, as I have found a few limitations when I am dealing with them right now."
"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."
"The setup was complex."
"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Wireless is ranked 2nd in Wireless LAN with 145 reviews while Mojo Networks is ranked 20th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews. Cisco Wireless is rated 8.2, while Mojo Networks is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless writes "Allows us to deploy a wide range of wireless products with stable WiFi". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mojo Networks writes "The product is easy to deploy since it can be done seamlessly with zero testing ". Cisco Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti WLAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Omada Access Points, whereas Mojo Networks is most compared with Mist AI and Cloud, Aruba Wireless and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN. See our Cisco Wireless vs. Mojo Networks report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
