We performed a comparison between Citrix Analytics for Security and IBM Security QRadar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)."One of the most valuable features is its ability to integrate with other solutions. IBM has a lot of solutions and we have managed to make it work with IBM BigFix and MaaS360, and even Microsoft."
"It provides many options for searching. I can see devices from different vendors, like Cisco, in one interface, which is good for me."
"On the back-end, Watson helps me figure out an exact problem, sometimes giving me the result."
"The solution is reliable."
"It comes with many rules disabled. You can tune them and modify them according to your enterprise needs and avoid false positives."
"An engineer can live-monitor all the flow happening in real-time. This would help us a lot while investigating a case, and it would even help us with preventive actions."
"The most valuable feature is the DSM Editor. The custom parsing tool is very nice, outstanding."
"Overall a great solution."
"The remote access features need improvement."
"Lacks recording features."
"I would suggest QRadar release any documentation or give an online demo, like videos on YouTube. It would increase publicity and public appeal."
"We have had problems with networking."
"The product can be a bit complex."
"Right now, if you look at the compatibility, if you need to deploy QRadar in a physical appliance you have only two choices of server, their own or a Lenovo server. In today's world, you cannot keep something tied to such a big brand. Clients want to be able to use whatever type of server they want."
"IBM QRadar has a margin for development, for out-of-the-box use cases. It can be enhanced with better support and automate the use cases for that."
"The AI engine could be smarter."
"QRadar log integration of various applications can be a tough job at times. There may be occasions when you will not find any QRadar guide on adding logs of a particular application. Even if you come across one, adding a log process is not an easy one."
"The playbook guide which specifies the rules for security use cases needs to be provided to support in case the organization needs help."
More Citrix Analytics for Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix Analytics for Security is ranked 18th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 2 reviews while IBM Security QRadar is ranked 1st in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 198 reviews. Citrix Analytics for Security is rated 8.0, while IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Citrix Analytics for Security writes "Helped the organization to provide high-security access to applications and performs well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". Citrix Analytics for Security is most compared with , whereas IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.