Citrix NetScaler ADC vs Loadbalancer.org

Citrix NetScaler ADC is ranked 2nd in Application Delivery Controllers with 15 reviews vs Loadbalancer.org which is ranked 5th in Application Delivery Controllers with 10 reviews. The top reviewer of Citrix NetScaler ADC writes "SSL VPN works very well; it's easy to set up and you can go very granular with it". The top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Just works, providing high-availability and load balancing when there is an outage". Citrix NetScaler ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, KEMP LoadMaster and A10 Networks Thunder ADC. Loadbalancer.org is most compared with KEMP LoadMaster, F5 BIG-IP and HAProxy . See our Citrix NetScaler ADC vs Loadbalancer.org report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix NetScaler ADC vs Loadbalancer.org and others in Application Delivery Controllers.
283,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Citrix NetScaler ADC vs Loadbalancer.org

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
One feature that works really well is the SSL VPN. It's very easy to set up and you can go very granular with it. You can define what user groups get what kind of access and the management overhead is very low.I like the monitoring ability as it enables me to identify when an internal (load-balanced) resource is having issues before it becomes a problem in production.Content Switching provides flexibility for routing traffic as desired to designated real servers. It also provides good geo capabilities through its GSLB feature.Provides resiliency for applications that reside on servers, as well as connectivity to remote applications.HTTP analysis and action. We have a lot of custom web applications that sometimes require custom header insertions. Some of these custom apps are external and, via the content switching, we can use one IP and leverage various back-end web app servers.Load Balancing and SSL offloading are key features.The GSLB feature allows us to move services between data centers. We can do this in either a planned or unplanned manner. We have experienced service provider outages at our primary data center and GSLB will kick in to automatically modify DNS records to point to a secondary data center (active/passive). We also make use of GeoIP information to point clients to the closest data center for accessing applications.Unified Gateway allows me to provide secure external access to applications for suppliers and customers while requiring Multi-Factor Authentication.

Read more »

We now get notifications when pool members go down, and we eliminate our downtime by not sending traffic to downed pool members.​With basic network knowledge, our required system functionality can be configured and maintained.​The load balancers have an easy installation and a relatively simple, easy user interface to use.The SSL Layer 7 load balancing is valuable.We have about 30,000 connections going through at any one time and it's fine, it doesn't seem to sweat. It doesn't get overloaded.Most important for us that it makes sure that the load is distributed and that we always have access to the end servers.The user interface precludes need to be well versed with Linux IPVS command line. This make it easy for junior team members to participate in managing load balancing needs.It does what it’s supposed to do which is balancing an important intranet site we are using, so if one server dies, the second becomes active straight away.

Read more »

Cons
The customization has always been a key area where some improvements are required. In the beginning, everything was for customizing the outer shell of it. You had to use the command-based utility and you had to do a lot of manual work. They have improved it a little bit and now there are some GUI-based functionalities that can be used. However, more can be done that doesn't require a lot of intervention. Right now there are some features, there are some customizations that can be done, but it's still very tedious, very cumbersome, a lot of work. So that could be simplified.In every release - and it doesn't matter if it's a minor release or a major release - they keep moving things around and they keep changing the mechanism. So certain things can work in one version one way, and everything works really well, then when you upgrade it to the next version, it breaks everything because they have a new way of doing it.Development team's response time could be better.Needs configuration processes like disabling LB VIPs, automatically disabling the IPs used.Getting to use some of the advanced tools, even with the assistance of Citrix support, can be challenging.The GUI should be improved.The main areas for improvement would be around documentation and support. If a feature can be used in two or three ways, show that feature being used in all of those ways. Documentation seems to only cover the primary use case and leaves you to either run through trial and error or consult the user community. In terms of support, I have never actually had them solve any of my issues. I have always solved them myself and then provided the resolution to support.Reducing the overhead required for AppFlow data collection, specifically for HDX Insight, would be a huge improvement.

Read more »

​I would like a notification when a new version of the software is available. They told me to sign up for their newsletter, but I have not received any notification for a newer software version.​Possibly a more graphical overview page (with colors) to give a two second overview to see if everything is working fine.​The automatic refresh of the System Overview webpage: It sometimes has an extra webpage reload (after a change) before you see it is executed. This can be confusing.They're mostly designed to balance a particular type of traffic. I wanted to load balance DNS, and they just don't do it the way that we wanted to. So they're not used as DNS load balancers.Originally we had some stability issues with it, so they replaced it with a new box and it's fine.It would be great if there was a way to gain access to the graphing data, to create custom reports. If we had a way to use the graphing data, we could use it to present certain information to our client, such as the uptime status for their service.If I have to say something, I suppose they could add an automated configuration backup to an FTP location (or something similar) so you don’t have to manually do it. I don’t see this as a problem, of course, as the configuration rarely changes and we only need one backup, but maybe for other users that feature would be handy.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is true that it is a bit pricey compared to newer technologies coming to the market. For example, A10 is a load balancer that does everything that Citrix can and it does a lot more than what NetScaler does when it comes to the security space, and their prices are so cheap. Every box comes with its own license and support built into it. When you compare that with NetScaler, you have to buy licenses separately, you have to buy a support agreement that is going to be separate. A small NetScaler, even if it is a VPX which is a virtual server, could cost you close to $150,000 to $200,000 dollars. So the pricing is really high.It all depends on the features that will be used and the number of accesses.Costly product and complicated licensing.It's not for startups or SOHO.

Read more »

It filled a requirement for our project, and it did so at lesser cost than their competitors.​These guys make their pricing scheme really easy.​It is inexpensive, and even their “unlimited” version, the VA MAX is still far cheaper than competitors.I love that they do not price on some arbitrary throughput rating where you are guessing at what the load balancer is going to handle.They're not the cheapest, not the most expensive, but I think value-wise, they're 100%.We've got an unlimited license, which doesn't costs that much compared to other vendors, and we don't have to buy it again.It was easy to upgrade the license for unlimited clusters and servers. Pricing is fair.I think it’s very affordable.

Read more »

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix NetScaler ADC vs Loadbalancer.org and others in Application Delivery Controllers.
283,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
11,662
Comparisons
7,332
Reviews
15
Followers
380
Avg. Rating
8.7
Views
631
Comparisons
262
Reviews
10
Followers
46
Avg. Rating
9.5
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 43% of the time.
See more Citrix NetScaler ADC competitors »
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
See more Loadbalancer.org competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsNetScaler
Website/Video
Website/VideoCitrix
Loadbalancer.org
Overview
OverviewCitrix NetScaler is deployed in thousands of networks around the globe to optimize, secure and control the delivery of all enterprise and cloud services, and to maximize the end user experience for all users including mobile clients.

Loadbalancer.org leads the market in delivering high-performance load balancers and load balancing solutions to customers around the world. Customers who depend on the high-availability of business critical applications can take advantage of unparalleled versatility, affordable costs and instant access to the industry’s most responsive 24/7 support – even during a free trial. Founded in 2002, Loadbalancer.org has offices in the USA, Canada, Germany and headquarters in the UK. With thousands of physical, virtual & cloud-based appliances deployed across six continents, Loadbalancer.org ensures the uptime of e-commerce websites & mission critical applications globally, whilst also improving performance, security, scalability and providing a rapid return on investment (ROI). Loadbalancer.org offers a no-nonsense approach and complete focus on load balancing.

OFFER
Learn more about Citrix NetScaler ADC
Learn more about Loadbalancer.org
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersABB Schweiz, Aer Lingus, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Amnet Technology Solutions, Aramex International, Ascenty, Atos, Autodesk Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company
33%
Healthcare Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Pharma/Biotech Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
19%
Pharma/Biotech Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
10%
No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
28%
Midsize Enterprise
28%
Large Enterprise
44%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
38%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix NetScaler ADC vs Loadbalancer.org and others in Application Delivery Controllers.
Download now
283,184 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email