Citrix Web App and API Protection vs Cloudbric comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo
1,500 views|914 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Cloudbric Logo
views| comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix Web App and API Protection and Cloudbric based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have all the features and functions of Citrix because we have a premium license."
  • "For partners, NetScaler is not as expensive price-wise versus F5."
  • "Citrix Web App and API Protection are in the middle when we talk about pricing and licensing"
  • "The pricing for Citrix Web App and API Protection is unreasonable. I don't know the exact price, but I heard it's tens of thousands and it's a bit too much for the small country I live in."
  • "The solution is expensive compared to one of its competitors."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight or nine out of ten."
  • "I rate the pricing an eight out of ten since it is expensive."
  • "In Turkey, everything is good, but it seems expensive for us due to the currency exchange. I don't have a specific rating scale, but if I had to rate the price, I would say it's around a six out of ten."
  • More Citrix Web App and API Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I prefer this solution because of its user-friendly interface. I find it simple and close to what I am currently using, which is Citrix Fortiva Access for Multi-Factor Authentication. I appreciate the… more »
    Top Answer:In Turkey, everything is good, but it seems expensive for us due to the currency exchange. I don't have a specific rating scale, but if I had to rate the price, I would say it's around a six out of… more »
    Top Answer:I am not an expert in this solution, but simplicity and user-friendly interfaces are crucial for me. I would appreciate advice from Citrix, particularly in the form of an interactive guide for API… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    1,500
    Comparisons
    914
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    430
    Rating
    7.3
    Unranked
    In Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall , Citrix Web App Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    Citrix Web App Firewall is a web application firewall (WAF) that protects web applications and sites from both known and unknown attacks, including application-layer and zero-day threats. Despite an ever-evolving threat landscape, Citrix Web App Firewall delivers comprehensive protection without degrading throughput or application response times. Available as a cloud solution or integrated within the Citrix ADC platform, simplified configuration controls further mitigate risk. Our pooled licensing options allow you to grow incrementally and scale on demand.

    Cloudbric is a cloud-based web security provider, offering an award-winning Web Application Firewall (WAF), DDoS protection, and SSL. Utilizing a logic-based detection engine to filter malicious website traffic with proven precision, Cloudbric delivers lower false positives than any industry competitor. Cloudbric’s cloud-based web security services are free for all websites with less than 4GB of bandwidth per month. We charge based on amount of web traffic, making Cloudbric perfect for SMEs, new startups, and personal websites.
    Sample Customers
    NSS Labs, ICSA Labs
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization57%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government3%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise62%
    Large Enterprise29%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix Web App and API Protection is ranked 20th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 10 reviews while Cloudbric doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Citrix Web App and API Protection is rated 8.0, while Cloudbric is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Citrix Web App and API Protection writes "Has a good graphic user interface for beginners, but lacks real-time notifications, alerts, and artificial intelligence". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudbric writes "Getting it running while retaining my mail service was tricky as I did not have control over my server. But working through several issues with my server and Cloudbric we were able to make it work. ". Citrix Web App and API Protection is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door, Fortinet FortiWeb, AWS WAF and Akamai App and API Protector, whereas Cloudbric is most compared with .

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.