Compare Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall vs. Imperva SecureSphere Database Security

Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall is ranked 9th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews while Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is ranked 2nd in Database Security with 9 reviews. Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall is rated 9.0, while Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall writes "Runs behind the scenes, in the background and keeps everything running smoothly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva SecureSphere Database Security writes "Assesses the vulnerability of the database while it is running". Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP, Fortinet FortiWeb and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, whereas Imperva SecureSphere Database Security is most compared with IBM Guardium, Oracle Audit Vault and Fortinet FortiDB.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Imperva, Cloudflare and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2019.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The web application firewall which protects our services on the internet, and then of course services like our ability to provide high availability for the services we are offering are the most valuable features.When our primary link goes down I can still get to my Cisco devices and the NetScaler devices on-prem because of the SDN solution. If the internet connection at one of the branches goes down, we can still route them, they still get internet based on the SDN solution through one of the other sites. They can carry on working.

Read more »

As we are very sensitive to financial impacts, this product provides great protection for our organization.The most valuable feature is the Data Masking.Flexible reporting allows for customization that keeps the admins from having to interact with system automation.A solution which does what other name brand products do for a lower cost.This solution has helped secure our Internet-based services, protecting us against DoS and other types of web-based attacks.The most valuable feature of this solution is the database security policy.The functionality is very useable and easy to understand.It has a lot of different components that cover the needs of our customers.

Read more »

Cons
The user interface could be more friendly. Some wizards and other documentation for administrators, as well as some use cases, helps us to understand the solution.Security could be improved because then I can get rid of my Cisco firewalls. If they improve the security then I could run my security, my proxy, my firewalling and my SDN solution on one device instead of having to have multiple devices.

Read more »

I would like to see improvement in the integration part of the tool. This should be an easy process.The firewall features are not very strong and should be improved.Performance can be slow under heavy loads, but this should be adjusted by scaling.The interface is not user-friendly.The GUI for this solution could use some improvement.Technical support for this solution needs improvement.It would be better to update the solution by using a GUI that guides me, rather than through a CLI.Integration with other databases or third-party products would be useful.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
We have all the licenses, which we pay for annually. The price is a little high, but the product is good.The pricing over-all depends on the entry level. For example, if support and maintenance are about $20,000 - $25,000, the initial cost can be five times more. It is less expensive for the company to maintain the client than to make the deployment.Pricing is low and scalable to add features and volume.There is an annual licensing fee for upgrading the device.Licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and it is a good value for the money.The cost of support for this solution is very expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,785
Comparisons
1,538
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
572
Avg. Rating
9.0
2nd
out of 17 in Database Security
Views
9,449
Comparisons
5,786
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
666
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Learn
Citrix
Imperva
Overview
Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall is a comprehensive full function ICSA, Common Criteria, FIPS-certified web application firewall that analyzes all bi-directional traffic, including SSL-encrypted communication, to protect against a broad range of security threats. It provides the ability to perform deep-packet inspection of HTTP, HTTPS and XML as well as protection against OWASP top 10. NetScaler AppFirewall threat protection includes and is not limited to SQL injection attacks, cross-site scripting attacks, cookie tampering, form validation and protection, HTTP and XML reply and request format validation, JSON payload inspection, signature and behavior based protections, data loss prevention (DLP) support including the monitoring of traffic for intended and unintended data exposure, DoS protection, authentication, authorization and auditing support and reporting, and policy tools that provide for easier PCI-DSS compliance verification.

Imperva SecureSphere Database Security:

  • Audits all access to sensitive data.
  • Alerts or blocks database attacks and unauthorized activities, in real time.
  • Detects and virtually patches database vulnerabilities.
  • Identifies excessive user rights and dormant users, and enables a complete rights review cycle.
  • Accelerates incident response and forensics investigations with advanced analytics.
Offer
Learn more about Citrix NetScaler AppFirewall
Learn more about Imperva SecureSphere Database Security
Sample Customers
NSS Labs, ICSA LabsBlueCross BlueShield, eHarmony, EMF Broadcasting, GE Healthcare, Metro Bank, The Motley Fool, Siemens
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm43%
Energy/Utilities Company14%
Government14%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company23%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Retailer6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise61%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise60%
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Imperva, Cloudflare and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: October 2019.
372,374 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email