• Home
  • Citrix ShareFile vs. DocStar ECM

Citrix ShareFile vs DocStar ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo

Citrix ShareFile

Read 11 Citrix ShareFile reviews
2,389 views|1,962 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Epicor Logo

DocStar ECM

Read 7 DocStar ECM reviews
168 views|92 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Content Collaboration Platforms
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and DocStar ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Salim Malik
Reliable, user-friendly, and secure
It has secure our data share between end user
Anonymous User
It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and...
* A/P Automation * H/R On boarding * Client/Vendor File Management * Contract Management
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You have to work hard in order to get the suitable licenses."
  • "If you are already a Citrix customer, I recommend having the Platinum licensing level, as it provides licensing for a number of various features that all integrate together."
  • "Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
  • "I give the cost of the solution a five out of five."

    • More Citrix ShareFile Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Citrix ShareFile?
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Citrix ShareFile?
    Top Answer:They should integrate the solution with more email services. That would be very helpful.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for Citrix ShareFile?
    Top Answer:We use the solution primarily for sending and receiving encrypted files. It helps us share large files as well.
    Read all 5 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    9th
    out of 38 in Content Collaboration Platforms
    Views
    2,389
    Comparisons
    1,962
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    891
    Rating
    8.7
    24th
    out of 46 in Enterprise Content Management
    Views
    168
    Comparisons
    92
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ShareFile
    docSTAR eclipse
    Learn More
    Citrix
    Epicor
    Overview
    ShareFile is a secure file sync and sharing service that meets the mobility and collaboration needs of users and the security requirements of businesses.
    Helping businesses translate vision into action for more than 20 years, DocStar offers delivers a flexible and innovative enterprise content management and process automation platform. Easy to implement and use—both in the cloud and on premises—DocStar proven technology and global process expertise empowers organizations to operate at peak performance, navigate change, and grow. By scaling and modernizing operations and enabling greater collaboration, DocStar allows data and transactions to flow efficiently throughout your organization. With increased visibility among employees, customers, and partners, we deliver better business outcomes such as increased auditability and greater ease of compliance.
    Sample Customers
    Exelon, Aer Lingus, Aloysius Stichting, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arup Group Ltd., Brasfield and Gorrie, Cancer Research UK, Carlock, Copeland & Stair LLC, ChanceLightŽ Behavioral Health & Education
    Gillette Pepsi CompaniesUnited Way of KnoxvilleUniversity of MichiganMohawk PaperCleveland IndiansThe City of CamdenPenn Foster Career SchoolCapital Cardiology AssociatesCollier Restaurant Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Legal Firm9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise47%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while DocStar ECM is ranked 24th in Enterprise Content Management. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while DocStar ECM is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of DocStar ECM writes "It has the flexibility to span across multiple departments, improving, for example, accounts-payable automation and contract management". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Box and Office 365, whereas DocStar ECM is most compared with .

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.