Compare Citrix ShareFile vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

Citrix ShareFile is ranked 8th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 1 review while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is ranked 5th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 13 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 6.0, while Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Easy to use and secure enough for personal data, but it is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Office SharePoint Server writes "Helpful alerts, historic file version audit capability, and full integration with Office Main Apps; Microsoft continues to evolve user interface and integration". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive and Dropbox, whereas Microsoft Office SharePoint Server is most compared with SAP Jam, Micro Focus Vibe and Oracle WebCenter.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2020.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the "Alert Me", which provides the ability to set an alert when content is either added or changed and that the alerts can be either real-time or aggregated for the day or the week.This solution has provided us with a collaborative workspace to allow everyone to work together and be on the same page.The software is friendly to use for mixing data and analyzing it.It's a very robust product.The solution's most valuable features is its document management. It allows sharing with external users and integrates well with Office apps and Microsoft Flow.The most valuable features for us are their document management list and hybrid forms. and We also use third party ad-dons to achieve workflows and other recent apps.The level of stability is good.The solution's most valuable aspects are its collaboration capabilities, its communications site and the innovation within the product itself.

Read more »

Cons
My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved.

Read more »

The ability to preview files in different formats should be expanded to include formats such as embedded postscript (EPS), AutoCAD, and Adobe Acrobat PDF.I would like to see more Agile techniques and seamless integration with other applications.This solution is not very stable. It is useful to arrange data but it's not the best for big data. Sometimes we have issues with our reports as a result.The product could be improved by accommodating different technologies, particularly integration.The solution needs to enable better sharing capabilities between users and external users. Several users also have problems with linking their emails to their Microsoft account.I think these tools do a pretty good job. There is only one area of improvement. Maybe Microsoft can invest a little bit more into the ease at which integration can be done with other third party applications.The solution is like a CRM, so the initial setup is complex. It takes a few days to deploy the solution and the length of time depends on how large the company's topology is and what the client's demands are.The permission management features need improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
There are some aggressive discounts offered by Microsoft for organizations that are not for profit, which we are, and it makes it quite attractive to consider.One of the reasons why we don't recommend the cloud version of SharePoint is the cost. With the on premise version, you pay for the license once. For the cloud version, there is a recurring fee. It is very expensive. They expect everyone to pay $20 or $30 per user per month.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
6,807
Comparisons
5,480
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
100
Avg. Rating
6.0
Views
569
Comparisons
384
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
498
Avg. Rating
7.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
ShareFileOffice SharePoint Server
Learn
Citrix
Microsoft
Overview
ShareFile is a secure file sync and sharing service that meets the mobility and collaboration needs of users and the security requirements of businesses.

Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) is a Microsoft software portal based on the ASP.NET framework. MOSS facilitates file sharing and collaboration, social networking, Web databases and Web publishing. It is hosted by Microsoft Windows Server and is accessible through Microsoft Office or the Web.

Offer
Learn more about Citrix ShareFile
Learn more about Microsoft Office SharePoint Server
Sample Customers
Exelon, Aer Lingus, Aloysius Stichting, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arup Group Ltd., Brasfield and Gorrie, Cancer Research UK, Carlock, Copeland & Stair LLC, ChanceLight┼Ż Behavioral Health & Education Del Monte Foods, Unicredit Leasing, Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council, Nokia Czech Republic, Perkins Eastman, JLL, ICA, ├│xito Software, Dorset Software, PKP Cargo, Arcapita Bank B.S.C., AVE CZ, Chesapeake Energy
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Government10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Media Company7%
REVIEWERS
Retailer20%
Government10%
Software R&D Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2020.
417,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.