We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms."It's user-friendly for end users."
"The Enterprise Dropbox solution is highly integrated with Microsoft's Office 365 and Azure products."
"The solution would query the Active Directory, and if new accounts were identified, Citrix ShareFile would add them automatically."
"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"The solution is scalable."
"Easy to manage and fully secure."
"It's a very good solution."
"OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information."
"We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful."
"Retention is useful. I have been pleased with the search functionality and the extensibility for tying it into integrations with other systems and building workflows on top of it."
"We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where everything is. Being able to use that on top of the Content Server was a big help."
"An SAP user can store documents directly into OpenText without a connector."
"Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface."
"We can configure the solution with any industry's products per customer requirements."
"My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved."
"The user interface is not very intuitive."
"There are sometimes scalability issues after updates."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"DLP features are lacking and required because, especially with everyone working from home, security is now paramount when the data is on BYOD devices."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great."
"The solution needs to improve the user interface."
"The initial setup can get really complicated, and it takes time."
"The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."
"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better."
"OpenText Extended ECM's user interface could be improved."
"Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important."
"User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client)."
Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Box and Office 365, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Alfresco and OpenText Content Manager.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
