Compare Citrix ShareFile vs. OpenText Core Share

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use OpenText Core Share? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."

More Citrix ShareFile Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
6,553
Comparisons
5,320
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
453
Rating
7.0
Views
85
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
ShareFile
Learn
Citrix
OpenText
Overview
ShareFile is a secure file sync and sharing service that meets the mobility and collaboration needs of users and the security requirements of businesses.

OpenText Core Share provides all the functionality needed to securely share and collaborate on projects with everyone inside and outside of the organization. Simple and intuitive to use, Core Share is a SaaS application that offers the enterprise level security and compliance IT departments require along with the flexibility that users want. Core Share’s unique ability to enable both a hybrid environment and a full cloud experience sets it apart from other major file sharing offerings.

Core Share is integrated with OpenText Core Signature, a professional and enterprise-grade electronic signature solution. An add-on to Core Share, Core Signature allows employees and third parties to sign quotes, contracts and other documents in a fast, compliant and hassle-free way. Together, users have a unified solution to solve all their enterprise content collaboration and approval needs.

Core Share is easily deployed and integrated with existing content management systems to extend collaboration beyond the corporate firewall. It integrates seamlessly with OpenText Enterprise Information Management (EIM) solutions to extend the value of existing enterprise content management (ECM) investments into the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Citrix ShareFile
Learn more about OpenText Core Share
Sample Customers
Exelon, Aer Lingus, Aloysius Stichting, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arup Group Ltd., Brasfield and Gorrie, Cancer Research UK, Carlock, Copeland & Stair LLC, ChanceLightŽ Behavioral Health & Education Pacific Life Insurance Company
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government8%
Construction Company5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Box, Google and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: January 2021.
457,209 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Citrix ShareFile is ranked 8th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews while OpenText Core Share is ranked 20th in Content Collaboration Platforms. Citrix ShareFile is rated 7.0, while OpenText Core Share is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Easy to use and deploy, with enterprise-level security features and good support ". On the other hand, Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and SmartVault, whereas OpenText Core Share is most compared with Box.

See our list of best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.