Citrix ShareFile vs SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix ShareFile and SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You have to work hard in order to get the suitable licenses."
  • "If you are already a Citrix customer, I recommend having the Platinum licensing level, as it provides licensing for a number of various features that all integrate together."
  • "Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
  • "I give the cost of the solution a five out of five."
  • More Citrix ShareFile Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:They should integrate the solution with more email services. That would be very helpful.
    Top Answer:We use the solution primarily for sending and receiving encrypted files. It helps us share large files as well.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    2,502
    Comparisons
    2,086
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    891
    Rating
    8.7
    Unranked
    In Content Collaboration Platforms
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ShareFile
    EXP Macess
    Learn More
    Overview
    ShareFile is a secure file sync and sharing service that meets the mobility and collaboration needs of users and the security requirements of businesses.

    Macess is an enterprise solution combining content management, business process management (BPM), customer relationship management (CRM) and leading-edge integration resources into a single application suite used across the organization.

    Sample Customers
    Exelon, Aer Lingus, Aloysius Stichting, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arup Group Ltd., Brasfield and Gorrie, Cancer Research UK, Carlock, Copeland & Stair LLC, ChanceLightŽ Behavioral Health & Education
    Ullico Inc., West Bend Mutual Insurance, Dakotacare, Tufts Health Plan, Liberty Life, Baloise Group
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Legal Firm9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Construction Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise30%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise46%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Content Collaboration Platforms
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Box, Microsoft and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix ShareFile is ranked 9th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 11 reviews while SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Content Collaboration Platforms. Citrix ShareFile is rated 8.4, while SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Flexible plans, stable, and scalable". On the other hand, Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Dropbox, Microsoft OneDrive, Box and Office 365, whereas SunGard EXP Macess [EOL] is most compared with Laserfiche Rio.

    We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.