We performed a comparison between Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Numecent based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, VMware and others in Application Virtualization."The most valuable feature is how secure the solution is."
"The most valuable feature is the automatic software upgrades because they take place on only three or four servers, rather than on 50 or 60 machines."
"The user experience when using the solution's technology remotely is definitely superior to our VPN and/or Windows Remote Desktop. It's a much better user experience for those folks."
"The tool helps me to connect with some apps of our company and resolve the tickets."
"The shadow feature is extraordinary and helps a lot when supporting remote users."
"Because of the solution's ubiquity, it is easier to find answers to problems than with competitive products."
"The product is simple to set up, and its deep integration with Microsoft is also a valuable feature."
"The app protection feature is one of the most valuable because it provides good security, as nobody is going to be able to look into your screen while you are sharing the screen. And if someone has installed a keylogger in your system, your keystrokes will be jumbled up and they would not make any sense to the keylogger. App protection is one of the coolest security features that I have encountered on any platform."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pros →
"Driver virtualisation"
"There are many latency and slowness issues, which are things looked after by Citrix."
"The Endpoint Management solution needs improvement when it comes to mobile device management. For example, they are still not supporting Windows 10 and this feature is required by many customers."
"For us, pricing is the most important feature to improve."
"Templating the deployment process could use improvement. When you start, there are a large number of details that are quite client-specific, although they do share common themes. To get somebody up and running in a day is very difficult to do. They should streamline by use case."
"Pricing and technical support needs improvement."
"As an end-to-end solution for implementing Zero Trust principles I would rate it a six or a seven out of 10, because it doesn't cover all aspects of Zero Trust. There are quite a few aspects you need to cover."
"The support offered by Citrix's partner needs to improve. The partner support platform should aim to provide more technical information to users."
"The product should expand its capabilities for integrating with other environments."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Cons →
"Self-service Portal."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is ranked 1st in Application Virtualization with 90 reviews while Numecent is ranked 6th in Application Virtualization. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is rated 8.4, while Numecent is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) writes "Flexible Deployment, reliable performance, and fast transmission speeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Numecent writes "Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions". Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is most compared with VMware Horizon View, Citrix Workspace, Amazon Appstream, Amazon WorkSpaces and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas Numecent is most compared with Microsoft App-V and VMware ThinApp.
See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
