We performed a comparison between Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) and Nutanix Frame based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Desktop as a Service (DaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product is stable."
"Stable product with straightforward setup."
"The remote desktop feature allows employees to work from home."
"Citrix is used by many organizations to make it possible to streamline the way different developers work together from different locations."
"The architecture I built had a robust failover mechanism for the endpoints, and the interface was user-friendly."
"Citrix offers a range of products that can be used straight out of the box."
"The installation and maintenance are good."
"The most valuable feature of Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops is the security and it is easy to work with."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pros →
"The scalability of the solution is quite good."
"Nutanix Frame is easy to install, manage, and upgrade."
"The singular management interface is crucial, particularly for the operations team as it minimizes complexity and enhances operational efficiency."
"The pricing of the solution and management are good features."
"The sales team does not focus on client needs but instead focuses on selling higher-priced items."
"The user profiles could use some improvement."
"I think improvement around the Analytics piece is super important. There has been a lot of maturity over the last year in that area, though a lot more needs to be done. Also, a lot more of the value of those Analytics needs to be sold to end users. Citrix is working on a lot of things that are ahead of the curve and a lot of organizations aren't quite there yet with implementing those technologies and capabilities."
"The product advances really fast. For some customers, we need better backwards compatibility."
"The support offered by Citrix's partner needs to improve. The partner support platform should aim to provide more technical information to users."
"The monitoring and management is in need of improvement."
"The product should expand its capabilities for integrating with other environments."
"There have been many issues with stability."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Cons →
"It would be highly beneficial if they could offer a version that is entirely on-premises, eliminating the need for cloud connection except for data access."
"The solution can be made faster and it should improve performance wise."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"As the solution is not completely straightforward, you do need some experience to configure and implement it."
More Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is ranked 1st in Desktop as a Service (DaaS) with 90 reviews while Nutanix Frame is ranked 4th in Desktop as a Service (DaaS) with 4 reviews. Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is rated 8.4, while Nutanix Frame is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) writes "Flexible Deployment, reliable performance, and fast transmission speeds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Frame writes "A cost-effective and streamlined virtual desktop infrastructure solution with a user-friendly interface and simplified management". Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) is most compared with VMware Horizon View, Citrix Workspace, Amazon Appstream, Amazon WorkSpaces and Microsoft Remote Desktop Services, whereas Nutanix Frame is most compared with VMware Horizon DaaS and Amazon WorkSpaces. See our Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs. Nutanix Frame report.
See our list of best Desktop as a Service (DaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Desktop as a Service (DaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
