Compare Citus Data vs. Oracle Database

Citus Data is ranked 14th in Relational Databases with 1 review while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases with 23 reviews. Citus Data is rated 9.0, while Oracle Database is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Citus Data writes "A solution that offers good scalability with a straightforward implementation process ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Enables us to combine all the sophisticated architectures in the market". Citus Data is most compared with CockroachDB, Vertica and Oracle Database, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with IBM Db2, SQL Server and MySQL.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citus Data Logo
2,085 views|1,690 comparisons
Oracle Database Logo
16,956 views|13,452 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Citus Data? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: September 2019.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It's very straightforward to implement the solution. It took us two days to set up everything.

Read more »

The feature I find most valuable about this solution is the reliability.The most valuable features of this solution are the cost optimizer and partition exchanges.It has automatic memory management capability and large file capability.The features that we find most valuable are Data Pump, GoldenGate, and the RMAN (Recovery Manager).We use the relational databases for government contracts.I really appreciate the performance of Oracle. When using AWR records you can really see where a problem is. You can get advice about which queries are the heaviest for the database. You also can see advice for indexes. If an index isn't used, then you can just remove it to improve performance. This is a really good feature. Also, the JDBC connection is quite good. Finally, the object types are really good, the types of tables you can use in PL/SQL are also really helpful.Using the product, we make less mistakes, are more organized and faster than if we did it any another way.Compared to other databases, Oracle Database is very simple to manage in terms of the database itself.

Read more »

Cons
More features in monitoring and the reporting could make it better.

Read more »

The product is very expensive.The cost of this solution needs to be improved.The Oracle Database could improve on integration with other infrastructure systems like Active Directory.This product would be improved with Support Services for more production access.It is expensive.There are a lot of bugs in the Oracle Database, and it would be better if the bugs would be solved more quickly than they are today.In general, the support is not good since most of the time the person whom you are given to is not so professional.Integration with big data would be helpful since we are planning to load a lot of big data.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
It is an excellent product, as long as the organization can afford the price tag.The price is very expensive for the support.The main issue where I feel that Oracle still has a problem is with the licensing. Licensing is still expensive and the reason why today most startups use other, cheaper databases. Those other databases are much less sophisticated than Oracle.​The license cost need to be optimized. The licensing cost is very high compared to other RDBMS.Be prepared to pay for consulting services, and do not underestimate the time required to find and hire good quality database administrators.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
14th
Views
2,085
Comparisons
1,690
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
299
Avg. Rating
9.0
2nd
Views
16,956
Comparisons
13,452
Reviews
24
Average Words per Review
336
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Oracle 12c, RDBMS
Learn
Citus Data
Video Not Available
Oracle
Overview

Citus is a distributed database that extends PostgreSQL, allowing you to continue using all the powerful Postgres features while still scaling.

Whether you're running into a ceiling on a single node, or need more performance for real-time analytical queries Citus can help.

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about Citus Data
Learn more about Oracle Database
Sample Customers
Cloud Flare, Agari, Mix Rank, HeapAgncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.A
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm14%
Government11%
Software R&D Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider8%
Manufacturing Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: September 2019.
371,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email