Clearswift Cryoserver vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Clearswift Cryoserver and Mimecast Mailbox Continuity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Veritas, Barracuda Networks and others in Email Archiving.
To learn more, read our detailed Email Archiving Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."
  • "The price of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is expensive."
  • More Mimecast Mailbox Continuity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways.
    Top Answer:I don't deal with the pricing or licensing aspects of the product I can't speak to how much it costs.
    Top Answer:Overall, just across all the Mimecast pieces that we use, it's somewhat of a mess when you want to figure out where you need to go to make a change. The interface isn't the best. How everything works… more »
    Ranking
    19th
    out of 21 in Email Archiving
    Views
    28
    Comparisons
    11
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    4th
    out of 21 in Email Archiving
    Views
    250
    Comparisons
    162
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    In the age where fast communication is key and email is the primary business collaboration tool, it is essential for organizations to protect the content and information they send and receive.

    However, with hundreds of emails moving within an organization each day and regulations that require emails to be kept, by law, for substantial retention periods, businesses face a huge issue of how to safely maintain compliance regarding email communications. Storage on mail servers is growing rapidly and companies need to offload these emails into a centralized, secure and audited repository.

    Mimecast Mailbox Continuity provides uninterrupted access to live and archive email using Outlook for Windows, the web and mobile applications.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    DAC Beachcroft, OceanFirst, Currie & Brown, Alexander Forbes, Lagan Group, Lals Group, Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, Wedlake Bell, Macmillan Cancer Support, Bech-Bruun
    Buyer's Guide
    Email Archiving
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Veritas, Barracuda Networks and others in Email Archiving. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Clearswift Cryoserver is ranked 19th in Email Archiving while Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is ranked 4th in Email Archiving with 6 reviews. Clearswift Cryoserver is rated 0.0, while Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity writes "Provides peace of mind and expands well but needs a better interface". Clearswift Cryoserver is most compared with , whereas Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is most compared with .

    See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

    We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.