Compare Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway vs. Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway? Share your opinion.
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Email Security. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"At one point, there was a zero-day attack. The Cisco appliance detected it and stopped it, helping us out. We avoided the attack and potential damage.""Because we scan products, and there is a lot of critical data, security is very important in these cases.""It sends us reports, where we can see if there have been attacks, e.g. DDoS. If so, we can switch to a clean IP.""It integrates with Active Directory and we can limit specific users to using specific applications.""I can customize the configuration and policies.""It blocks bulk marketing messages, graymail, spam, and provides advanced malware protection.""The most valuable features are protection against ransomware and spam.""The user interface was quite friendly, it was quite easy to use, unlike some other Cisco products. Anybody could use it. You don't have to be familiar with IT to be able to handle navigating it."

More Cisco Secure Email Pros »

"A stable solution."

More Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway Pros »

"The product is good. To date, we have not faced any challenges.""The piece that is most valuable from the Mimecast standpoint will be the sandboxing feature.""It's really quite user-friendly. In terms of technical superiority and the product itself, there are no complaints. It is really cutting edge."

More Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection Pros »

Cons
"I would like them to add some clustering or high availability features.""The initial setup was complex because I have two sites with physical clusters.""The hardware is not up to the mark. Two to three times a year we have complete downtime.""The graphical user interface is not user-friendly like other vendors. I find it very difficult at times to find some options on the UI.""I would like to see sandboxing for email, where suspicious emails received by the system are analyzed through online services.""The user interface needs some improvement to become more user-friendly. The graphics could be better. It's designed more for a technical user rather than a business user.""We didn't get any malware, but a few phishing emails, maybe one or two, slipped in.""One of the things that Cisco could improve on with IronPort is the support. Cisco doesn't really have enough engineers who have full, hands-on knowledge of IronPort. Knowledge of it is not something you can find easily compared to other security appliances."

More Cisco Secure Email Cons »

"Malware needs improvement."

More Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway Cons »

"The price could be better, it should be reduced.""The detection rates are an area for improvement.""We have subscribed to an archival service, and yet, when we have to get our data out, we have to pay a fee to get our own data. They charge an extraction fee."

More Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We do annual licensing for Cisco Secure Email Gatewayand SMA together, and possibly SmartNet support. Packaged together, the cost is just under $38,000.""In addition to the standard licensing, there is a cost for SMARTnet as well.""Pricing depends on your environment and which model you want to buy.""Licensing costs depend on how many users there are. It could range between $5 and $7 per month, per user.""The license was not per user, the license model was per feature. You could choose anti-virus, anti-spam, etc. It was feature-based and charged yearly.""There were no other costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""We were using Proofpoint and then we switched to Cisco... reportability was one of the main reasons we switched, but the biggest one was cost. If you can get an equivalent functionality for a better price it's wise to do so. That's what our primary decision came down to: We could get equivalent functionality at a lower price point.""It is not that costly. We pay for the solution through a contractor and pay an annual fee."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"It's an expensive solution.""The licensing costs are per-user for the product that you get with them."

More Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are Advanced Malware Protection, URL filtering, and of course Reputation Filtering.
Top Answer: The reporting functionality needs to be improved.
Top Answer: I have experience as an SE for IronPort as well as a private consultant. I have used this solution in multiple… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Learn
Cisco
Clearswift
Mimecast
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway (SEG) offers cyber-attack protection and outbound data loss prevention for secure email collaboration. With its legacy in the MIMEsweeper for SMTP technology, the Clearswift SEG incorporates the latest in inbound threat protection (Sophos and/or Kaspersky AV), a multi-layer spam defence mechanism, multiple encryption options, deep content inspection control on size and types of attachments and Adaptive Redaction features.

Mimecast’s Advanced Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection uses multiple, sophisticated, detection engines and a diverse set of threat intelligence sources to protect email from spam, malware, phishing, and targeted attacks delivered as a 100% cloud-based service.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway
Learn more about Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, IndraVolusion County SchoolsAzizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company25%
Manufacturing Company13%
Healthcare Company13%
University6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider34%
Computer Software Company20%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider22%
Educational Organization8%
Manufacturing Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider13%
Insurance Company6%
Wholesaler/Distributor5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise54%
Large Enterprise43%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Proofpoint and others in Email Security. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is ranked 15th in Email Security with 1 review while Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection is ranked 9th in Email Security with 3 reviews. Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is rated 8.0, while Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway writes "Stable, but malware needs improvement and customer support is poor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection writes "Protects your organization from all types of threats". Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, Forcepoint Email Security, Symantec Messaging Gateway, Barracuda Email Security Gateway and Fortinet FortiMail, whereas Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection is most compared with Agari, Barracuda Essentials, Fortinet FortiMail, Forcepoint Email Security and Barracuda Sentinel.

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.