Compare Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway vs. mxHERO for Legal

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: June 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"You're going to get what you pay for. If you're not willing to pay the price of Cisco, you're not going to get a product that's as good as Cisco. I don't think Cisco is overpriced, because for the last two years I've been comparing it to Microsoft and Cisco has been cheaper and given us more features.""In my previous organization, avoiding four instances of CryptoLocker within an estimated six month period is approximately $600,000 in lost time and effort. Our five year cost was about a million dollars, and the four outages that we had equated to 65 percent of that five year cost.""The licensing was all transferred.""Compared to Cisco's on-prem service, the cost is the same, but you don't have to pay for the hardware and you don't have to maintain the system, as far as upgrades and hardware failures are concerned. It is cheaper to operate on their cloud service than it is to operate with their on-prem service.""Cisco Secure Email and the support are priced well. It's not cheap, but there are other solutions that offer less and cost so much. For example, Microsoft is more expensive than Cisco.""There are additional fees for adding features."

More Cisco Secure Email Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The malicious URL scanning, as well as the anti-malware features, have been really useful for us in our environment.
Top Answer: With respect to transferring policies and licenses, Smart Licensing has really improved the overall licensing model for… more »
Top Answer: The UI is definitely one area of improvement because it doesn't match other interfaces and the navigation can be a… more »
Top Answer: Compared to other similar products, this is an expensive solution.
Top Answer: They need to improve the malware in the product. I am not satisfied with Clearswift because of the lack of customer… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cisco Email Security, IronPort, Cisco Email Security, ESA, Email Security Appliances
Learn More
Overview

Customers of all sizes face the same daunting challenge: email is simultaneously the most important business communication tool and the leading attack vector for security breaches. Cisco Email Security enables users to communicate securely and helps organizations combat Business Email Compromise (BEC), ransomware, advanced malware, phishing, spam, and data loss with a multilayered approach to security.

Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway (SEG) offers cyber-attack protection and outbound data loss prevention for secure email collaboration. With its legacy in the MIMEsweeper for SMTP technology, the Clearswift SEG incorporates the latest in inbound threat protection (Sophos and/or Kaspersky AV), a multi-layer spam defence mechanism, multiple encryption options, deep content inspection control on size and types of attachments and Adaptive Redaction features.

Email under control & safe
Email is the lifeblood of any legal practice. Confidential information is exchanged continuously through email, whether among internal teams, with clients, the opposition, or the courts. Unfortunately, legal practitioners are saddled with a perfect storm of dealing with the most highly sensitive information within extremely vulnerable email. Few solutions make it easy for attorneys and staff to manage complicated and highly sensitive, content-based legal workflows. mxHERO comes to the rescue, providing an innovation that changes almost nothing for users yet changes almost everything with regards to security and manageability of email correspondence.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Secure Email
Learn more about Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway
Learn more about mxHERO for Legal
Sample Customers
SUNY Old Westbury, CoxHealth, City of Fullerton, Indra
Volusion County Schools
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company21%
Retailer16%
Manufacturing Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider31%
Computer Software Company21%
Financial Services Firm5%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider22%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise66%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Email Security. Updated: June 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is ranked 21st in Email Security with 1 review while mxHERO for Legal is ranked 53rd in Email Security. Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is rated 8.0, while mxHERO for Legal is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway writes "Stable, but malware needs improvement and customer support is poor". On the other hand, Clearswift SECURE Email Gateway is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, Forcepoint Email Security, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection and Symantec Messaging Gateway, whereas mxHERO for Legal is most compared with .

See our list of best Email Security vendors.

We monitor all Email Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.