We performed a comparison between Cloud Foundry and Google Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."My favorite component of IBM's solution is Node-RED, which greatly shortens the amount of time required to develop, test, and deploy new applications."
"IBM is the only vendor to offer integration with blockchain for smart contract development."
"Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the user."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The solution can scale."
"The infrastructure is easy to manage."
"The stability is good with Google Cloud."
"You can just connect and start using it through a browser within a few minutes."
"It is a stable solution."
"Google Cloud is a good alternative solution. I think it's a better fit for Mac operating systems than Windows. If you're utilizing Google Cloud for something like big data, then their big query is decent."
"This is a solution that's so easy to expand when you need it to. It's the best I've ever seen. It's much better than Azure."
"In IBM Cloud, the product has been deprecated in favor of Kubernetes, which is a more complicated infrastructure to manage."
"After the initial excitement period with Node-RED is over, you crave the need of additional integrations to third-party services."
"I feel that the Google product is incomplete with regard to internal communications. It is an area that needs some improvement."
"The solution should be more configurable for high-volume databases."
"I would improve the integration with other devices such as smartphones. It is integrated in our company, but I think it could be improved."
"When companies grow at a larger scale, they may shift to a different cloud services provider like AWS or Oracle."
"I find it hard to download items, especially on their operating system."
"The solution could improve by being less expensive."
"Microsoft's solution is more common, Google Cloud could improve by being more compatible with different platforms or entities."
"Monitoring and usage reporting could be improved."
Cloud Foundry is ranked 21st in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews while Google Cloud is ranked 5th in PaaS Clouds with 66 reviews. Cloud Foundry is rated 5.0, while Google Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloud Foundry writes "Quick to deploy but being deprecated by IBM and should be merged with Kubernetes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". Cloud Foundry is most compared with Pivotal Cloud Foundry, VMware Tanzu Application Service, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS and OpenShift, whereas Google Cloud is most compared with Linode, Alibaba Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and OpenShift.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.