We performed a comparison between Cloud Foundry and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."IBM is the only vendor to offer integration with blockchain for smart contract development."
"My favorite component of IBM's solution is Node-RED, which greatly shortens the amount of time required to develop, test, and deploy new applications."
"Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the user."
"The product gives you independence from hardware onsite, the setup is easy, and there is no need for hardware maintenance."
"What I like best about Oracle Cloud is that it is an all-in-one system for everything."
"The performance and processing capability are excellent."
"Oracle Cloud Platform has good scalability."
"The most important features are the turnkey solutions offered by Oracle. These ease the administration of Oracle Databases."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring."
"We are not using any features offered by OCI but only using virtual machines. So our data only syncs from our On-premises to cloud. The compute and performance are better than other cloud solutions."
"The pricing of the solution is pretty good."
"In IBM Cloud, the product has been deprecated in favor of Kubernetes, which is a more complicated infrastructure to manage."
"After the initial excitement period with Node-RED is over, you crave the need of additional integrations to third-party services."
"I work with many clouds and I would say, in comparison, others have a better presentation of services and they have clearer steps in terms of implementation."
"The tool should provide more options like other cloud services. Also, it should improve scalability with the free version."
"Oracle Cloud Platform can improve the integration with hybrid and cross-cloud deployments. It should be a flexible solution with a very well-defined integration with other applications in the hybrid environment. There are certain integrations that are not straightforward."
"There's a need for further customization to unlock the platform's full potential."
"The product’s pricing should be reduced."
"Sometimes when we install something, we need to partition and maybe rebuild the index. This can cause some issues for performance. In the future, I would like to see more stability and fewer bugs."
"Oracle support could be better; we had cases where certain regions experienced specific issues and received little help from Oracle."
"The solution should integrate better with other tools and different vendors."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloud Foundry is ranked 21st in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in PaaS Clouds with 91 reviews. Cloud Foundry is rated 5.0, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cloud Foundry writes "Quick to deploy but being deprecated by IBM and should be merged with Kubernetes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Cloud Foundry is most compared with Pivotal Cloud Foundry, VMware Tanzu Application Service, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS and OpenShift, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and OpenShift.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
