We performed a comparison between Cloud Foundry and Salesforce Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the user."
"IBM is the only vendor to offer integration with blockchain for smart contract development."
"My favorite component of IBM's solution is Node-RED, which greatly shortens the amount of time required to develop, test, and deploy new applications."
"What we like the most about it is the fact that it helps us track the record of our projects. It keeps everything on one interface, facilitating the operations and planning."
"Salesforce's strongest feature is reporting especially. It's also a lot more usable than other platforms I've worked with. It has a great user experience, with the ability to filter and access information in real-time."
"I found the ease of use most valuable in the Salesforce Platform. I also found the platform pretty light."
"There are no major performance issues in the solution."
"It's very flexible and offers tremendous features for customers."
"The keyword search helps me in finding stuff quickly. So, I don't have to click around a lot."
"The most valuable features are quick customization, solid deployment processes, and excellent reliability."
"It is a great platform. It's definitely an improvement from the GCP application that we were using previously."
"After the initial excitement period with Node-RED is over, you crave the need of additional integrations to third-party services."
"In IBM Cloud, the product has been deprecated in favor of Kubernetes, which is a more complicated infrastructure to manage."
"I don't have any notes for improvement. It serves us well."
"It is quite expensive. It has gotten to that point where it is a lot more pricey. It has kind of got its own proprietary language for development. It is probably never going to change, but if it had a more market language for development, it would be easier to find developers. They come at a premium cost, so it is expensive."
"Salesforce needs to be re-platformed, or re-architected, making it lighter."
"This platform is indeed on the expensive side."
"They should provide access to data quality tips and tricks to make it better."
"The cost of data storage is an issue once the company grows."
"An expensive solution requiring a lot of configuration."
"The management of Salesforce could be quite a task. Old and unusable contacts can add up over time. If I could wave a magic wand, it would be to initiate a self-cleaning feature."
Cloud Foundry is ranked 21st in PaaS Clouds with 2 reviews while Salesforce Platform is ranked 8th in PaaS Clouds with 80 reviews. Cloud Foundry is rated 5.0, while Salesforce Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloud Foundry writes "Quick to deploy but being deprecated by IBM and should be merged with Kubernetes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce Platform writes "Reliable with good reporting and custom dashboards". Cloud Foundry is most compared with Pivotal Cloud Foundry, VMware Tanzu Application Service, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS and OpenShift, whereas Salesforce Platform is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure, Appian and ServiceNow.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.