Compare Cloudberry Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Cloudberry Backup is ranked 12th in Cloud Backup with 3 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked 4th in Cloud Backup with 17 reviews. Cloudberry Backup is rated 8.6, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cloudberry Backup writes "Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP writes "Enables us to manage multiple petabytes of storage with a small team, including single node and HA instances". Cloudberry Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Veeam Backup for Microsoft Office 365 and SolarWinds MSP Backup & Recovery, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN and IBM Spectrum Scale. See our Cloudberry Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudberry Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Provides connectivity to a lot of different cloud storage solutions.It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution.General ease of use and performance of the Windows version is the most valuable feature.Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end.Block level transfers have significantly reduced the amount of time for transfers over some other solutions

Read more »

This solution has made everything easier to do.The solution’s unified file and block-storage access across our infrastructure is invaluable. Without it, we can't do what we do.The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient.The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc.We're using snapshots as well and it's a pretty useful feature. That is one of the main NetApp benefits. Knowing how to use snapshots in the on-prem environment, using snapshots on the cloud solution was natural for us.Unified Manager, System Manager, and Cloud Manager are all GUI-based. It's easy for somebody who has not been exposed to this for years to pick it up and work with it.We use the mirroring to mirror our volumes to our DR location. We also create snapshots for backups. Snapshots will create a specified snapshot to be able to do a DR test without disrupting our standard mirrors. That means we can create a point-in-time snapshot, then use the ability of FlexClones to make a writeable volume to test with, and then blow it away after the DR test.NetApp's Cloud Manager automation capabilities are very good because it's REST-API-driven, so we can completely automate everything. It has a good overview if you want to just have a look into your environment as well.

Read more »

Cons
Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default.The Linux GUI leaves a lot to be desired. It lacks many of the features of the Windows version and is buggy, but it is still usable.The interface feels like it is targeted for end users who typically are looking for an all-in-one integrated push button solution. It would be better if the interface had a beginner mode and an expert mode.

Read more »

Multipathing for iSCSI LUNs is difficult to deal with from the client-side and I'd love to see a single entry point that can be moved around within the cluster to simplify the client configuration.We have used technical support. As long as they don't call me at four o'clock in the morning to tell me that a drive failed and they are sending me another one, I like it. They have a tendency to do that.How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically.The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data... I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud.Some of the licensing is a little kludgey. We just created an HA environment in Azure and their licensing for SVMs per node is a little kludgey. They're working on it right now.Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair.One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have.The only issue we had lately was that outside our VPC we could not reach the virtual IP, the floating IP. I heard that they have fixed that...

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.We have a very good return on investment.Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost.

Read more »

Our licensing costs are folded into the hardware purchases and I have never differentiated between the two.Cost is a big factor, because a lot of companies can't afford enterprise grade equipment all the time. They skimp where they can. I would recommend that they improve the cost.Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs.I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs.In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer.The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company.They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage...The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
2,966
Comparisons
2,183
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
374
Avg. Rating
8.7
4th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
3,638
Comparisons
2,245
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
1,036
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud
Learn
CloudBerry Lab
NetApp
Overview

CloudBerry Backup is a leading cross-platform cloud backup and disaster recovery solution. Cloudberry Backup is integrated with major public cloud services, such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. CloudBerry Backup comes with powerful, easy-to-use backup and disaster recovery capabilities, including file-level and image-based backups, disaster recovery to virtual machines in the cloud, data compression and military-grade encryption using customer-controlled keys. Customers can run CloudBerry Backup on Windows, Mac and Linux operating systems.

CloudBerry also provides a turnkey, white-label data protection service to thousands of VARs and MSPs to help them build their brand in the cloud backup market.

Since 2012, CloudBerry Lab has been an Amazon Web Services Advanced Technology Partner. CloudBerry Lab has also achieved Storage Competency Partner status in the AWS Partner Network.

For more information please visit www.cloudberrylab.com 

Follow us on Twitter at @cloudberrylab

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

Offer
Learn more about Cloudberry Backup
Learn more about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Rohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Manufacturing Company23%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudberry Backup vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,397 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email