We performed a comparison between CloudBolt and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."The initial deployment was super easy."
"Role-based access control and application blueprinting."
"The solution's biggest advantage is flexibility"
"I find the self-service features valuable."
"Hybrid cloud platform for VM and app deployment and management, with very good stability. It's customizable, easy to set up, and can be deployed within half an hour."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Technical support is helpful."
"The open, flexible architecture has brought in the agile computing environment along with better Dr capabilities. Automation management and operational tasks across VMware and third-party applications, like our HMIS and other business productivity applications, have delivered peace of mind."
"The most crucial feature of vCenter is its scalability. We can use it to expand our network, so we don't have to report our client devices. The network configuration features are also helpful because we can migrate entire networks."
"If I need to do DR, VMware can enable me to use vMotion, which requires use of vCenter. You cannot do vMotion without vCenter. We do a lot of automation, orchestration, and simplification for that purpose."
"The product's integration is good, it works well with other programs and solutions."
"I am impressed with the tool's easiness to work with VMware solutions."
"vCenter Orchestrator's best features are the workflows, integration with third-party applications, and the workflow library."
"The solution is not easy to use. It's not intuitive enough to click anywhere in the solution and make it work."
"The area of integrating on-prem and cloud needs improvement."
"The management of SaaS must be improved."
"The scheduling feature of CloudBolt needs improvement because sometimes, it doesn't work."
"Could increase the number of integrations and add more out-of-the-box work flows."
"In the next release, to make it easier to write the workflows, I would l like to see more HTML GUIs."
"There can be compatibility issues."
"The response time of vCenter Orchestrator's support could be improved."
"It is practically difficult at this stage to really comment on the improvisations of V central. But more tech events and PoC cases would help the EA to design better solutions and utilization."
"I would like to see better performance."
"This solution needs to have more built-in workflows."
"The solution needs to integrate with Cloud facilities like AWS and Azure."
"The scalability option provided by the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
CloudBolt is ranked 21st in Cloud Management with 8 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. CloudBolt is rated 8.4, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CloudBolt writes "Should be made considerably easier to use, though it offers much flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". CloudBolt is most compared with Morpheus, VMware Aria Operations, VMware Aria Automation, IBM Turbonomic and BMC Helix Cloud Security, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
