CloudCheckr vs Sonatype Container comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudCheckr and Sonatype Container based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup is straightforward.""It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better.""The solution is scalable for our purposes.""The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away.""The solution is mostly stable.""The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use.""The recommendation section is pretty helpful.""It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

More CloudCheckr Pros →

"The most valuable features of the Sonatype Nexus Container are the safe repository it provides, we do not have a lot of risk from security flaws. Security scanning and other security feature are helpful to reduce vulnerabilities. For example, if I'm receiving something from a public repository, such as Maven Deposit, I don't know if it is will open me up to vulnerabilities, but if you have the Sonatype Nexus Container, it's safer in terms of security."

More Sonatype Container Pros →

Cons
"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want.""Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help.""The performance of the tool really needs to be improved.""The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited.""Many features still need to be implemented in this tool.""The solution must improve its user interface.""What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere.""The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

More CloudCheckr Cons →

"Sonatype Nexus Container you could improve the search functionality. Whenever I try to search a specific version of the library from the Sonatype Nexus Container console, I don't think the first referral that the user is receiving is very informative. They cannot see which one is the most updated library inside the Sonatype Nexus Container when I'm searching for a specific library."

More Sonatype Container Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • "The cost is on par with other providers."
  • More CloudCheckr Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable for our purposes.
    Top Answer:I found it less useful. My group took the data and organized it with Tableau. I used CloudCheckr to verify what I was seeing in Tableau. The solution must improve its user interface.
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the Sonatype Nexus Container are the safe repository it provides, we do not have a lot of risk from security flaws. Security scanning and other security feature are… more »
    Top Answer:Sonatype Nexus Container you could improve the search functionality. Whenever I try to search a specific version of the library from the Sonatype Nexus Container console, I don't think the first… more »
    Top Answer:Sonatype Nexus Container is used mainly for storing your dependencies and the libraries that the applications are using. Additionally, it is used when the applications are downloading the dependencies… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    Views
    712
    Comparisons
    521
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    543
    Rating
    8.7
    14th
    Views
    86
    Comparisons
    22
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    265
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
    Sonatype Nexus Container
    Learn More
    Overview
    CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization. 

    The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

    We are laser focused on helping organizations continuously harness all of the good that open source has to offer, without any of the risk. In order to do this, we have invested in knowing more about the quality of open source than anyone else in the world. This investment takes the form of machine learning, artificial intelligence, and human expertise, which in aggregate produces highly curated intelligence that is infused into every Nexus product. Organizations equipped with Nexus products make better decisions, innovate faster at scale, and rest comfortably knowing that their applications always consist of the highest quality open source components

    Sample Customers
    Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer11%
    Government9%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Cost Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloudCheckr is ranked 8th in Cloud Cost Management with 8 reviews while Sonatype Container is ranked 14th in Cloud Cost Management with 1 review. CloudCheckr is rated 7.6, while Sonatype Container is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloudCheckr writes "Beneficial granular reporting, highly stable, and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sonatype Container writes "Beneficial security, reliable, and scalable". CloudCheckr is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Azure Cost Management, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, Apptio One and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Sonatype Container is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.