• Home
  • CloudCheckr  vs. Granulate

CloudCheckr vs Granulate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Spot by NetApp Logo

CloudCheckr

Read 8 CloudCheckr reviews
670 views|491 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Granulate Logo

Granulate

425 views|320 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Cost Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudCheckr and Granulate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Peter Ramnath
Provides recommendations regarding how cost and consumption can be adjusted, but the reporting and analytic...
The product gives some recommendations on how cost can be optimized based on usage. We take those recommendations and have discussions with our... Read more →
Use Granulate?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • "The cost is on par with other providers."

    • More CloudCheckr Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about CloudCheckr ?
    Top Answer:The recommendation section is pretty helpful.
    Read all 7 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?
    Top Answer:The price depends on the actual Azure consumption and what we feed into it. The cost is on par with other providers.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?
    Top Answer:We are not happy with the product’s reporting capabilities. We are planning to change the solution. The security compliance feature doesn’t give much data because CloudCheckr has done a majority of… more »
    Read all 7 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    7th
    out of 38 in Cloud Cost Management
    Views
    670
    Comparisons
    491
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    568
    Rating
    8.0
    13th
    out of 38 in Cloud Cost Management
    Views
    425
    Comparisons
    320
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
    Learn More
    Spot by NetApp
    Granulate
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    CloudCheckr CMx High Security is a cloud management platform that provides complete visibility into cost and security issues. The primary use cases are day-to-day operations, cloud management, identifying open vulnerabilities and issues from a security perspective, and cost management and optimization. 

    The solution is praised for its stability, simplicity, ease of use, scalability, excellent technical support, and granular reporting. CloudCheckr CMx High Security provides priority-level data on security issues and vulnerabilities, making it easy to identify critical issues that need immediate attention.

    Real-Time Continuous Cloud Compute Optimization.
    Cloud Native Autonomous, AI-driven Performance Boost.
    Organizations utilize the cloud for increased flexibility and fast growth but face growing cloud bills. Granulate is engineered for cloud-native and hybrid environments – providing significant cost reduction and performance optimization without any code changes.

    Sample Customers
    Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer11%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company33%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer6%
    Legal Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Cost Management
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management. Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloudCheckr is ranked 7th in Cloud Cost Management with 8 reviews while Granulate is ranked 13th in Cloud Cost Management. CloudCheckr is rated 7.6, while Granulate is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CloudCheckr writes "Beneficial granular reporting, highly stable, and excellent support". On the other hand, CloudCheckr is most compared with Azure Cost Management, AWS Trusted Advisor, Apptio One, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Granulate is most compared with Densify and IBM Turbonomic.

    See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.