Cisco Webex Experience Management vs Oracle WebCenter comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Webex Experience Management and Oracle WebCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Freshworks, Qualtrics, ServiceNow and others in Customer Experience Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Customer Experience Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ByungsooChoi
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It works well in general, we haven't had any issues with it. It is stable and useful."

More Cisco Webex Experience Management Pros →

"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.""Integration within the solution is very good.""The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet.""It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage.""Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data.""A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access.""You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."

More Oracle WebCenter Pros →

Cons
"It is very expensive but there are no additional charges after it's purchased."

More Cisco Webex Experience Management Cons →

"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product.""Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version.""WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system.""This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language.""There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market.""Its functions need more stability.""The speed of the backup should be enhanced.""I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."

More Oracle WebCenter Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The price needs to be lowered."
  • "The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."
  • "WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."
  • More Oracle WebCenter Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Experience Management solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It works well in general, we haven't had any issues with it. It is stable and useful.
    Top Answer:Cisco Webex Experience Management is very expensive but there are no additional charges after it's purchased. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of costliness.
    Top Answer:I wouldn't say it needs any improvement on the technical side, but it could be less expensive.
    Top Answer:WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.
    Ranking
    Views
    171
    Comparisons
    109
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    306
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    38
    Comparisons
    29
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    189
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CloudCherry
    WebCenter, FatWire
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Cisco Webex Experience Management is a comprehensive solution designed to help organizations enhance customer experiences. Its primary use case is to collect and analyze customer feedback across various touchpoints, such as surveys, social media, and online reviews.

    The most valuable functionality of Cisco Webex Experience Management is its ability to provide real-time insights and actionable recommendations. It leverages advanced analytics and AI to identify trends, sentiments, and customer preferences. This enables organizations to make data-driven decisions and improve their products, services, and overall customer satisfaction.

    By capturing and analyzing customer feedback, Cisco Webex Experience Management helps organizations understand their customers better. It allows them to identify areas of improvement, address customer pain points, and deliver personalized experiences. This ultimately leads to increased customer loyalty, higher customer retention rates, and improved brand reputation.

    Moreover, Cisco Webex Experience Management enables organizations to engage with customers proactively. It provides tools for targeted surveys, sentiment analysis, and social media monitoring. This helps organizations identify potential issues before they escalate and allows them to respond promptly, ensuring customer satisfaction.

    Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

    Sample Customers
    HDFC, PUMA, Dessert School, Caratelane, MYA, Tata Steel, Titan, University of Essex, Voonik, Fasttrack, Yatra, Central, MakeMyTrip
    Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Pharma/Biotech Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    University9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Customer Experience Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Freshworks, Qualtrics, ServiceNow and others in Customer Experience Management. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Webex Experience Management is ranked 10th in Customer Experience Management with 1 review while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 20th in Customer Experience Management with 12 reviews. Cisco Webex Experience Management is rated 6.0, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Webex Experience Management writes "Very stable but exceptionally costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch". Cisco Webex Experience Management is most compared with Teradata Customer Interaction Manager, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and Liferay Digital Experience Platform.

    See our list of best Customer Experience Management vendors.

    We monitor all Customer Experience Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.