Compare CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is ranked 11th in Cloud Backup with 3 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked 4th in Cloud Backup with 14 reviews. CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is rated 8.4, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery writes "It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP writes "Enables us to manage multiple petabytes of storage with a small team, including single node and HA instances". CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is most compared with Zerto, Veeam Backup & Replication and Oracle Data Guard, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN and IBM Spectrum Scale. See our CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We went from an organization with minimal to no disaster recovery. I was able to spin up the disaster recovery environment with AWS rather quickly and meet business requirements.We have never had any issues with scalability.It provides our disaster recovery solution. It works fine in our tests.​​The initial setup is really straightforward.Technical support has been very good. They usually respond quickly to our requests.​

Read more »

The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are good. Snapshot copies are pretty much the write-in time data backups. Obviously, critical data is snapshotted a lot more frequently, and even clients and end users find it easier to restore whatever they need if it's file-based, statical, etc.We're using snapshots as well and it's a pretty useful feature. That is one of the main NetApp benefits. Knowing how to use snapshots in the on-prem environment, using snapshots on the cloud solution was natural for us.Unified Manager, System Manager, and Cloud Manager are all GUI-based. It's easy for somebody who has not been exposed to this for years to pick it up and work with it.We use the mirroring to mirror our volumes to our DR location. We also create snapshots for backups. Snapshots will create a specified snapshot to be able to do a DR test without disrupting our standard mirrors. That means we can create a point-in-time snapshot, then use the ability of FlexClones to make a writeable volume to test with, and then blow it away after the DR test.NetApp's Cloud Manager automation capabilities are very good because it's REST-API-driven, so we can completely automate everything. It has a good overview if you want to just have a look into your environment as well.Another feature which gets a lot of attention in our environment is the File Services Solutions in the cloud, because it's a completely, fully-managed service. We don't have to take care of any updates, upgrades, or configurations.The FlexClones make all the management easier for us.NetApp's XCP Migration Tool... was pretty awesome. It replicated the data faster than any other tool that I've seen. That was a big help.

Read more »

Cons
The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line.Definitely there should be better logging. From a customer perspective I would like to see more logs on what is happening. If there is an issue, I would like to know what the problem is. Right now, we have to depend on the support of the vendor to check and let us know, because we don't have access to a lot of logging information.The UI could be a little sleeker.The only thing I would like to see is, they don't have a formal ticketing system. There is no way I can go back and see what questions we had six months back, what issues we had, and how they were resolved.Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. ​

Read more »

How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically.The DR has room for improvement. For example, we now have NetApp in Western Europe and we would like to back up the information to another region. It's impossible. We need to bring up an additional NetApp in that other region and create a Cloud Manager automation to copy the data... I would prefer it to be a more integrated solution like it was in the NetApp solution about a year ago. I would like to see something like AltaVault but in the cloud.Some of the licensing is a little kludgey. We just created an HA environment in Azure and their licensing for SVMs per node is a little kludgey. They're working on it right now.Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair.One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have.The only issue we had lately was that outside our VPC we could not reach the virtual IP, the floating IP. I heard that they have fixed that...The navigation on some of the configuration parameters is a bit cumbersome, making the learning curve on functions somewhat steep.I would like to see them improve the perspective of start and search in the panels. This would allow for better visualization of the contents that are captured in the tool.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair.Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up.It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery.I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward.We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.​

Read more »

Cloud is cloud. It's still expensive. Any good solution comes with a price tag. That's where we are looking to see how well we can manage our data in the cloud by trying to optimize the costs.I know the licensing is a bit on the high-end. That's when we had to downsize our MetroCluster disks and just migrate to disks that were half used. We migrated into those just to reduce maintenance costs.In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer.The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company.They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage...The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately.Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration.The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.
377,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
11th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
2,131
Comparisons
1,223
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
640
Avg. Rating
8.3
4th
out of 44 in Cloud Backup
Views
3,638
Comparisons
2,245
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
1,036
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud
Learn
Amazon
NetApp
Overview

With CloudEndure Disaster Recovery technology, business continuity and IT resilience are a click away. CloudEndure's one-touch disaster recovery solution utilizes block-level continuous replication, application stack orchestration, and automated machine conversion to ensure near-zero RPO and RTO for all applications, while reducing traditional disaster recovery expenses by over 85%.

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

Offer
Learn more about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
Learn more about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP
Sample Customers
Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight NetworksRohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Manufacturing Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Manufacturing Company24%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm5%
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
377,029 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email