Compare CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use CloudEndure Disaster Recovery? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex.""For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

More CloudEndure Disaster Recovery Pros »

"If you have a fair amount of experience with NetApp, you can work on it very easily.""The most valuable feature is the ease of file storage.""If anything happens, their technical support will come onsite and fix it.""ONTAP has been very stable for us, specifically in the cloud environment. It allows us to have high availability as well as standalone systems if that's what we want within our specific workloads. Also, on-premise has been a very stable environment. We have very few outages and when we do, we work with support to get systems back online in a timely manner.""The ability for our users to restore data from the Snapshots is very valuable.""Its functionality and technical support are adequate to help prevent failure due to errors.""SnapMirror helps mirror metadata and data volumes between endpoints in a data fabric.""The FlexClones make all the management easier for us."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pros »

Cons
"The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement.""I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."

More CloudEndure Disaster Recovery Cons »

"When it comes to support provided by NetApp, they have room for improvement. Every time we go through their support, we end up answering the same routine questions.""The data tiering needs improvement. E.g., moving hard data to faster disks.""I would like to have more management tools. They are difficult to work with, so I would like them to be a bit more user-friendly.""The key feature, that we'd like to see in that is the ability to sync between regions within the AWS and Azure regions. We could use the cloud sync service, but we'd really like that native functionality within the cloud volume service.""I would like to see them improve the perspective of start and search in the panels. This would allow for better visualization of the contents that are captured in the tool.""The navigation on some of the configuration parameters is a bit cumbersome, making the learning curve on functions somewhat steep.""The only issue we had lately was that outside our VPC we could not reach the virtual IP, the floating IP. I heard that they have fixed that...""Scale-up and scale-out could be improved. It would be interesting to have multiple HA pairs on one cluster, for example, or to increase the single instances more, from a performance perspective. It would be good to get more performance out of a single HA pair."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was good, but it was a test system, not a real purchase.""We purchased the product directly from NetApp.""The deal with the seller was acceptable; the pricing is reasonable.""The AWS consumer-based pricing model makes it easy for developers to use their credit cards to spin up virtual servers immediately.""Compared to other storage vendors, NetApp, is not always able to compete with their pricing. Yet, we acknowledge the ease of use ONTAP brings with the AWS integration.""They allow a special price if you are working closely with them. Since we have a lot of NetApp systems, we got some kind of discount. That's something they do for other customers, not just for us. The price was fair. In addition to the licensing fees, you're paying Amazon for your usage...""The standard pricing is online. Pricing depends. If you're using the PayGo model, then it's just the normal costs on the Microsoft page. If you're using Bring Your Own License, which is what we're doing, then you get with your sales contact at NetApp and start figuring out what price is the best, in the end, for your company.""In addition to the standard licensing fees, there are fees for Azure, the VMs themselves and for data transfer."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine.
Top Answer: I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives. Right now, it is difficult and painful to do. When you are working with multiple terabytes, there are no good solutions.
Top Answer: I am a solution architect and I analyze customer's information in order to suggest products for them. CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is one of the solutions that I am familiar with. It is used for… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
4,148
Comparisons
2,891
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
200
Avg. Rating
6.5
Views
7,802
Comparisons
3,745
Reviews
36
Average Words per Review
943
Avg. Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO
Learn
Amazon
NetApp
Overview

With CloudEndure Disaster Recovery technology, business continuity and IT resilience are a click away. CloudEndure's one-touch disaster recovery solution utilizes block-level continuous replication, application stack orchestration, and automated machine conversion to ensure near-zero RPO and RTO for all applications, while reducing traditional disaster recovery expenses by over 85%.

The leading enterprise-grade storage management solution, delivers secure, proven storage management services and supports up to a capacity of 368TB. Software service supports various use cases, such as: File shares and block-level storage serving NAS (NFS, SMB / CIFS) and SAN (iSCSI) Disaster Recovery, Backup, and Archive DevOps Databases (SQL, Oracle, NoSQL) Cloud Volumes ONTAP is offered in a standard single-node configuration or in a High Availability (HA) configuration.

Offer
Learn more about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
Take Control with Unified Cloud Storage

Sign up for a 30-day trial to see how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help you optimize cloud storage costs and performance, while enhancing data enterprise-grade protection, security, and compliance - wherever your data lives.

Sample Customers
Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight NetworksRohit, AdvacnedMD, D2L, Trinity Mirror, Eidos Media, WireStorm, Cordant Group, JFK Medical Center, ALD Automotive, Healthix, City of Baton Rouge, ON Semiconductor
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Media Company34%
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider12%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company27%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Transportation Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Manufacturing Company11%
Media Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business7%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise80%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise82%
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,546 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 2 reviews while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 39 reviews. CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is rated 6.6, while NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery writes "Straightforward to set up and is scalable for large nodes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP writes "Enables us to manage multiple petabytes of storage with a small team, including single node and HA instances". CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is most compared with Azure Site Recovery, Zerto, Oracle Data Guard, Veeam Backup & Replication and Cohesity DataProtect, whereas NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is most compared with Azure NetApp Files, Red Hat Ceph Storage, VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale and Elastifile. See our CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP report.

See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors and best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.