Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs MarkLogic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cloudera Logo
772 views|598 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
MarkLogic Logo
234 views|176 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and MarkLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Cloudera is a very manageable solution with good support.""The product as a whole is good.""The search function is the most valuable aspect of the solution.""In terms of scalability, if you have enough hardware you can scale out. Scalability doesn't have any issues.""The most valuable feature is Impala, the querying engine, which is very fast.""The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform.""Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was.""The scalability of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is excellent."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pros →

"MarkLogic's greatest asset is its strong engineering foundation. It was specifically designed with search capabilities in mind, and the developers placed a great emphasis on ensuring the quality of the indexing and all subsequent layers that were added.""The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details."

More MarkLogic Pros →

Cons
"The pricing needs to improve.""There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one.""There are multiple bugs when we update.""The competitors provide better functionalities.""The governance aspect of the solution should be improved.""Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on.""It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform.""While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."

More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Cons →

"The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved.""One of the most common requests is to improve the user interface of the database. While it is primarily a database, there are other databases available that offer more user-friendly interfaces. The UI is good for developers but not for regular users. More visuals would be beneficial."

More MarkLogic Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "When comparing with Oracle Sybase and SQL, it's cheaper. It's not expensive."
  • "The price could be better for the product."
  • "I haven't bought a license for this solution. I'm only using the Apache license version."
  • "Cloudera requires a license to use."
  • "Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is expensive, with support costs involved."
  • "I wouldn't recommend CDH to others because of its high cost."
  • "The price is very high. The solution is expensive."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "MarkLogic is a pricey option, but there are some advantages to its pricing structure. For medium-sized clients or departments within larger companies, it is possible to obtain a license for one or two nodes for less than a hundred thousand dollars. Additionally, if you only need to deploy a single node, you can do so for under fifty thousand dollars. This is in contrast to other high-quality software options that are only accessible to larger businesses, where the starting price can be upwards of two hundred thousand dollars."
  • More MarkLogic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product comes with an annual subscription, which is expensive. They are bundling technologies together. You have to pay an extra cost if you need the technology out of the base license.
    Top Answer:The rules can show us if there are missing items, like titles, and we can add them in to ensure everything is filled and makes sense and there are no missing details.
    Top Answer:It's a costly product. However, their reputation justifies the cost. It's a trusted product.
    Top Answer:The spreadsheet capabilities could be improved. We need to convert spreadsheets into an open XML format. We have to do a few levels of conversions before we convert the data into the information we… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    772
    Comparisons
    598
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.1
    9th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    234
    Comparisons
    176
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    587
    Rating
    9.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is the world's most complete, tested, and popular distribution of Apache Hadoop and related projects. CDH is 100% Apache-licensed open source and is the only Hadoop solution to offer unified batch processing, interactive SQL, and interactive search, and role-based access controls. More enterprises have downloaded CDH than all other such distributions combined.
    MarkLogic is an operational and transactional Enterprise NoSQL database that is designed to integrate, store, manage and search SON and XML documents and semantic data (RDF Triples).
    Sample Customers
    37signals, Adconion,adgooroo, Aggregate Knowledge, AMD, Apollo Group, Blackberry, Box, BT, CSC
    ALM, American Psychological Association, American Society of Agronomy, Cond_ Nast, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Institute of Engineering and Technology, JWG Group, Lagardre Active, RSuite CMS, Wiley
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Insurance Company14%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Educational Organization8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise55%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise74%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while MarkLogic is ranked 9th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while MarkLogic is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MarkLogic writes "Frequent updates, helpful search capabilities, and high quality support". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and Cassandra, whereas MarkLogic is most compared with MongoDB and Cassandra. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. MarkLogic report.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.