We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."With a cluster available, you can manage the security layer using the shared SDX - it provides flexibility."
"Provides a viable open-source solution for enterprise implementations and reliable, intelligent data analysis."
"Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was."
"It has the best proxy, security, and support features compared to open-source products."
"The most valuable feature is Impala, the querying engine, which is very fast."
"The solution is stable."
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized."
"The solution is reliable and stable, it fits our requirements."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool performs well."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The solution is not fit for on-premise distributions."
"Without the big data environment, we cannot store all of this data live. We have billions of records and terabytes of storage to be used. It's not an option actually for us to have a big data environment."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has a limited feature list and a lot of costs involved."
"While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."
"The one thing that we struggled with predominately was support. Because it was relatively new, support was always a big issue and I think it's still a bit of an ongoing concern with the team currently managing it."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"The solution does not support multiple languages very well and this means users need to create work-arounds to implement some solutions."
"They should focus on upgrading their technical capabilities in the market."
"The installation is difficult."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
