We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We're now able to store large volumes of data through Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop. We're able to push large volumes of data to the platform, and that used to be a challenge, especially when storing a terabyte of information. This is the area where Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop improved the organization."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"We also really like the Cloudera community. You can have any question and will have your answer within a few hours."
"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable."
"We had a data warehouse before all the data. We can process a lot more data structures."
"The data science aspect of the solution is valuable."
"Very good end-to-end security features."
"With a cluster available, you can manage the security layer using the shared SDX - it provides flexibility."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"The one thing that we struggled with predominately was support. Because it was relatively new, support was always a big issue and I think it's still a bit of an ongoing concern with the team currently managing it."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"The areas of improvement depend on the scale of the project. For banking customers, security features and an essential budget for commercial licenses would be the top priority. Data regulation could be the most crucial for a project with extensive data or an extra use case."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there is a lot of things that need to improve."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and SingleStore, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Oracle NoSQL. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. ScyllaDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
