We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cloudflare Access vs. Duo Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cloudflare Access Logo
3,545 views|2,926 comparisons
Duo Security Logo
9,145 views|8,037 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Our licensing fee is currently on an annual basis.""During testing we are allowed a certain number of licenses for free.""Their pricing model is a little bit weird. Currently, there is no price advantage in signing up for yearly contracts. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing costs.""Its price is reasonable. It is not highly expensive."

More Duo Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure… more »
Top Answer: The multi-factor authentication process and the geo-locking features are great.
Top Answer: Our licensing fee is currently on an annual basis. There are two levels of support with Duo that we were considering. The first level of support is just the two-factor authentication — it doesn't do… more »
Ranking
11th
out of 26 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
3,545
Comparisons
2,926
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
3rd
out of 26 in ZTNA as a Service
Views
9,145
Comparisons
8,037
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
620
Rating
8.3
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Secure, authenticate, and monitor user access to any domain, application, or path on Cloudflare.

Quickly apply application-level user access permissions using existing single sign-on providers.

Ensure compliance using real-time access logs available in the dashboard, API, or using a SIEM.

Cloud-based user authentication vendor: authenticate with your phone, Duo mobile app, landline, or tokens with or without an internet connection
Offer
Learn more about Cloudflare Access
Learn more about Duo Security
Sample Customers
23andMe
Threadless, Yelp, Etsy, Eventbrite
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider26%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company21%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company4%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business57%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cloudflare Access is ranked 11th in ZTNA as a Service while Duo Security is ranked 3rd in ZTNA as a Service with 5 reviews. Cloudflare Access is rated 0.0, while Duo Security is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Duo Security writes "A highly-scalable multi-factor authentication solution". Cloudflare Access is most compared with Zscaler Private Access, Zscaler SASE, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Netskope CASB and Perimeter 81, whereas Duo Security is most compared with Microsoft Authenticator, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Fortinet FortiToken, Yubico YubiKey and OneSpan DIGIPASS.

See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.