We compared Okta Workforce Identity and Cloudflare Access across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: Based on the comparison of Okta Workforce Identity and Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity is highly praised for its user-friendly interface, integration capabilities, and valuable features like single sign-on and multi-factor authentication. However, users have suggested improvements in password management and customer support. On the other hand, Cloudflare Access is valued for its DDoS protection and connectivity to data centers, along with its customizable access control and user-friendly interface. Pricing is a concern for both products, with Okta Workforce Identity considered expensive and Cloudflare Access having mixed opinions. Customer support for both products has generally received positive feedback.
"For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan...The most valuable feature is their protection."
"Enables me to work from two locations."
"It's the endpoint exposition. We don't need to expose our VPN server to the internet and need a zero-test solution. I can apply some conditional access to the endpoint that's connecting to our network to check their security policies or the security condition of their workstation. Once the workstation is trying to connect to my internal network, then I would like to check the discrete condition of these endpoints that are trying to access my internal network. We created some conditional access. We have CrowdStrike, to check if the CrowdStrike is installed, to check if it's updated, and to check for Windows updates. We created some conditional policies to check it."
"The tool also offers good scalability, and the dashboard, along with real-time analytics, is very good."
"Cloudflare, in my opinion, was easy to implement."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"It has a wide range of MFA options. I prefer "Okta Verify" out of them all."
"It is flexible and easy to install."
"It made things a lot easier, especially with passwords."
"It offers very helpful support. The technical team is very helpful."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I like the tool's workflows, which is user-friendly. It can integrate with different applications. I particularly like that users are delighted to access their applications without the hassle of entering their username and password each time. It truly enhances user-friendliness."
"The solution so far has been very stable."
"When there are any dynamic changes in complex applications, the tool takes a lot of time, making its analytics-related area a major matter of concern where improvements are needed."
"They don't have a person to provide support for customers using the solution under their free plan."
"The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems."
"For the topic of improvement, providing some training material is one of my suggestions."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"Its pricing needs improvement."
"We still had to write several internal programs/scripts to complete the user-provisioning process. Okta does not have the ability to provision mailbox accounts for on-premise Exchange or in a hybrid O365 environment. The Group Push function from Okta to AD did not work reliably in our environment."
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."
Cloudflare Access is ranked 7th in Access Management with 5 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 3rd in Access Management with 56 reviews. Cloudflare Access is rated 8.8, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cloudflare Access writes "Replaces traditional VPN and enables endpoint exposition ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Cloudflare Access is most compared with Twingate, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Auth0 and FortiSASE , whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Saviynt. See our Cloudflare Access vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Access Management vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
