Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Indusface AppTrana comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup process is simple.""We like that there's load balancing, firewall capabilities, DDoS protection, et cetera, all covered by Cloudflare.""The Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's most valuable feature is its ease of configuration.""The solution protects our application, which runs on the HTTP protocol, from DDoS attacks.""Caching is the most valuable feature of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.""I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features.""The integration of Cloudflare with Cloud Suite is its most valuable feature.""The product has a valuable security control functionality."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pros →

"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."

More Indusface AppTrana Pros →

Cons
"If they add logs history within the Cloudflare offering, that would be a great benefit.""Cloudflare Web Application Firewall should include port forwarding features.""The blocked logs are difficult to read at times.""The ModSecurity core rules need to be updated.""The notification part could be improved. It's very much connected to Web Application Firewall, rate-limiting, and DDoS protection.""It would be ideal if the solution offered better log integration and more integration with different platforms.""Cloudflare Web Application Firewall should improve visibility for a customer.""Its stability could be better."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Cons →

"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."

More Indusface AppTrana Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
  • "The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
  • "Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Indusface AppTrana is an affordable and cost-effective solution."
  • More Indusface AppTrana Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has a valuable security control functionality.
    Top Answer:Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.
    Top Answer:The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.
    Top Answer: One of the best practices is to educate employees on how to avoid becoming a bot, so to speak. Attackers often use compromised devices controlled remotely to launch DDoS attacks. It's essential to… more »
    Top Answer:The self-managed rules feature offers a lot of flexibility in defining the trigger conditions for activating rules within users' applications. Users can specify the circumstances under which the… more »
    Top Answer: Two of the advanced techniques that a WAF employs are geo-fencing and geo-blocking to further enhance security. Geo-fencing allows users to create a virtual perimeter around a specific geographical… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    8,743
    Comparisons
    6,350
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    338
    Comparisons
    269
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloudflare WAF
    AppTrana
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    AppTrana is designed to address the shortcomings in existing cloud security solutions which claim to provide comprehensive protection using only technology based cookie cutter solutions. Welcome to the new world of AppTrana where your entire application security is custom built by experts based on your existing risk posture.

    Sample Customers
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    Shoppers Stop, TCS
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Media Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business65%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise54%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 16 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 33rd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai App and API Protector, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, AWS WAF and Radware DefensePro.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.