We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs. Signal Sciences

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF.""The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The security features are valuable. The particular feature we use is called OWASP.
Top Answer: Their documentation could be better. They don't have documentation that explains everything well. They have documentation for everything you're looking for, but they lack a single piece of… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
1,089
Comparisons
829
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
566
Rating
8.0
Views
2,332
Comparisons
1,598
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Cloudflare WAF
Signal Sciences Next-Gen WAF, Signal Sciences RASP
Learn More
Fastly
Video Not Available
Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

Signal Sciences' next-gen web application firewall (WAF) and runtime application self protection (RASP) increase security and maintain reliability without sacrificing velocity - all at the lowest total cost of ownership.

Offer
Learn more about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall
Learn more about Signal Sciences
Sample Customers
crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
Chef, Adobe, Datadog, Etsy, GrubHub, Vimeo, SendGrid, Under Armour, Duo, AppNexus
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company22%
Government7%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 16th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while Signal Sciences is ranked 24th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.0, while Signal Sciences is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A SaaS solution that is API configurable and a convenient part of a suite but needs updating of core rules". On the other hand, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Azure Front Door, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Fastly and Indusface AppTrana, whereas Signal Sciences is most compared with AWS WAF, Cloudflare, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM).

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.