Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Threatx comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cloudflare Logo
8,623 views|6,257 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Threatx Logo
178 views|135 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Threatx based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."
  • "We pay $210 per month for CloudFlare WAF."
  • "The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."
  • "Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."
  • "The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."
  • "Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."
  • More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has a valuable security control functionality.
    Top Answer:Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions.
    Top Answer:The platform's control features related to real-time authentication and response time need improvement.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    8,623
    Comparisons
    6,257
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    178
    Comparisons
    135
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloudflare WAF
    Learn More
    Threatx
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

    ThreatX’s attacker-centric approach against DDoS, Bot-based attacks, API abuse, exploitations of vulnerabilities, zero-day attacks, and more – provides unique, multi-layered detection capabilities to accurately identify malicious actors and respond. The ease of deploying ThreatX and the availability of our application security experts makes ThreatX the perfect blend of a product and a service to protect your web applications and APIs from today’s modern threat landscape.
    Sample Customers
    crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk
    BMC
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    Web Application Firewall (WAF)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is ranked 7th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 16 reviews while Threatx is ranked 38th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is rated 8.2, while Threatx is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall writes "A cloud solution for web application firewall protection with rate-limiting, managed, and custom firewall rules". On the other hand, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Akamai App and API Protector, AWS WAF, Fortinet FortiWeb and Azure Front Door, whereas Threatx is most compared with Cloudflare, AWS WAF and Salt Security.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.