Compare Cloudian HyperFile NAS Storage vs. Nasuni

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cloudian HyperFile NAS Storage Logo
99 views|83 comparisons
Nasuni Logo
2,584 views|2,198 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

More Nasuni Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
22nd
out of 26 in NAS
Views
99
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
8th
out of 26 in NAS
Views
2,584
Comparisons
2,198
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
563
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Cloudian HyperFile, HyperFile
Learn More
Overview

Cloudian HyperFile is a scale-out NAS controller that delivers file services from Cloudian HyperStore object storage systems. The HyperFile NAS Controller delivers unified support for file and object storage plus enterprise NAS features—such as SMB/NFS support, POSIX compliance, and WORM protection.

Nasuni combines storage, backup and disaster recovery into a single solution. No additional backup software is necessary. With multiple copies of every snapshot stored in the cloud across multiple geographies, in locations of the company’s choosing, the enterprise is fully protected in case of a disaster. A full restore is as simple as starting up a virtual machine.

Offer
Learn more about Cloudian HyperFile NAS Storage
Learn more about Nasuni
Sample Customers
City of Montebello Bus Lines, Dentsu, PostFinance, University of Leicester
Environmental Systems Design Inc., Imagination, Lewis Group of Companies, Saint Michaels College, TBG Partners, Sedgwick LLP, Barry Isett & Associates, Perkins+Will
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company11%
Manufacturing Company9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, Dell EMC and others in NAS. Updated: May 2021.
501,499 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cloudian HyperFile NAS Storage is ranked 22nd in NAS while Nasuni is ranked 8th in NAS with 1 review. Cloudian HyperFile NAS Storage is rated 0.0, while Nasuni is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nasuni writes "A very stable and scalable solution with the global file locking feature and the ability to quickly deploy new sites". Cloudian HyperFile NAS Storage is most compared with FreeNAS and Dell EMC PowerScale (Isilon), whereas Nasuni is most compared with Panzura, Qumulo, AWS Storage Gateway, Egnyte Connect and NetApp Cloud Backup.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.