Compare Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID
Cloudian HyperStore is ranked 8th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 4th in File and Object Storage with 4 reviews. Cloudian HyperStore is rated 9.0, while NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudian HyperStore writes "Scalability, Amazon S3 compatibility allow us to move back and forth with a hybrid cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". Cloudian HyperStore is most compared with Scality RING8, EMC Elastic Cloud Storage and NetApp StorageGRID, whereas NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with EMC Elastic Cloud Storage, Red Hat Ceph Storage and Cloudian HyperStore.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Pure Storage, SwiftStack and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2020. 407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud. Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes. The licensing that the S3 service provides them from a FabricPool standpoint is more attractive than the licensing from AWS or Azure. We save money on storage costs from this solution since it allows us to have a source of revenue from customers consuming the service. While we have been able to save money on storage costs, it could be better. The price is attractive. We chose NetApp because of price and performance. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs. 407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 3,211 Comparisons 2,415 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 284 Avg. Rating 9.0 | Views 3,290 Comparisons 2,147 Reviews 4 Average Words per Review 677 Avg. Rating 8.3 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 20% of the time.  Compared 15% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. | Compared 30% of the time.  Compared 26% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| HyperStore | Storage GRID |
Learn | |
| Cloudian Video Not Available | NetApp |
Overview | |
Cloudian HyperStore lets you start small and grow to hundreds of petabytes on-premises simply by adding nodes. Leverage the proven interoperability of the industry’s only 100% native S3 API. | Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Cloudian HyperStore | Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID |
Sample Customers | |
| NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo | ASE, DARZ GmbH |
Top Industries | |
Software R&D Company39% Comms Service Provider11% Media Company10% Retailer9% | Software R&D Company33% Comms Service Provider15% Manufacturing Company13% Financial Services Firm13% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Pure Storage, SwiftStack and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Cloudian HyperStore Reviews, NetApp StorageGRID Reviews, and our list of Best File and Object Storage Companies.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.