Compare Cloudian HyperStore vs. NetApp StorageGRID
Use Cloudian HyperStore? Share your opinion.
 | Jamil Alatrash Lead Infrastructure Engineer at a financial services firm |
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: February 2021.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It is very durable and that is particularly important."
"The ability to get to the StorageGRID from anywhere on my network. The solution is remote. You don't have to be at a physical location."
"The implementation with NetApp went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance."
"It has enabled us to save money on storage costs. We removed our tape library."
"It has improved our operational efficiency through time consumption and logistics by 40 to 50 percent. Everything that had to do with our legacy tape solution has been improved and is now more efficient."
"Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple."
Cons
"It is a cloud-based environment and at times, it is not very simple to use."
"There was a small amount of confusion when working with StorageGRID and Active Directory for access. We had to do things three to four times resulting in our engineer troubleshooting a couple of things. The location of the menu, along with what is inside the menu: configurations, settings, etc., is not straightforward to users. Most users are Windows-based. So, when make logical changes to the menu which are not similar to Windows, users and administrators get confused."
"The redundancy and reliability are great, but I also see room for improvement there. I would like to see more efficiency in the storage and dedupe/compression solutions."
"Our fees are approximately half a dollar per gigabyte."
"Creating your own data stores, backups, or storage grids, helps eliminate all these costs of downloading all the data back after you downloaded to the cloud."
"Buying the solution is expensive, but it saves you money down the line when you factor in the logistics of not having to buy tapes."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: Duplication, interface and the manageability is good and simple.
Top Answer: We had issues in a few areas because we couldn't do it from GUI. There is a separate tool for accessing the object and removing it and this created quite a challenge while exiting the data on… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case for this product is to replicate our backups to cloud on StorageGRID. We are integrators and don't use the solution ourselves, we install it for our clients. I'm an IT Service… more »
Views
3,735
Comparisons
2,746
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
483
Rating
8.0
Views
4,626
Comparisons
2,947
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
728
Rating
8.5
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
HyperStore, Cloudian HyperStore Object Storage, HyperStore Object Storage
Storage GRID
Cloudian HyperStore lets you start small and grow to hundreds of petabytes on-premises simply by adding nodes. Leverage the proven interoperability of the industry’s only 100% native S3 API.
Store and manage unstructured data at scale using NetApp StorageGRID for secure, durable object storage. Place content in the right location, at the right time, and on the right storage tier, optimizing workflows and reducing overall costs for globally distributed rich media.
Learn more about Cloudian HyperStore
Learn more about NetApp StorageGRID
NTT Communications, Casale, Kumo
ASE, DARZ GmbH
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
Computer Software Company28%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government8%
No Data Available
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pure Storage, Red Hat, NVIDIA and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: February 2021.
464,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Cloudian HyperStore is ranked 10th in File and Object Storage with 1 review while NetApp StorageGRID is ranked 6th in File and Object Storage with 2 reviews. Cloudian HyperStore is rated 8.0, while NetApp StorageGRID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cloudian HyperStore writes "A reasonable-priced and durable solution for storing our company backup data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp StorageGRID writes "The implementation went smoothly. It is a 'setup and forget' type of appliance". Cloudian HyperStore is most compared with Scality RING8, Dell EMC ECS, Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO and Qumulo, whereas NetApp StorageGRID is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, Dell EMC ECS, MinIO, Scality RING8 and Pure Storage FlashBlade.
See our list of best File and Object Storage vendors.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.