We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and CloudLock based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."The posture management and remediation features are the most valuable. We use GSL Builder to build custom rules in alignment with our organization's policies. CloudGuard has canned rules using multiple standard frameworks, but we also have additional rules."
"The way they offer container security is a big highlight that I have noticed. The solution is also agentless, so the scanning, runtime, really everything is offered directly by CloudGuard."
"The tool is also very intuitive; its dashboards are very complete and provide a lot of valuable information for decision-making to improve security."
"The rulesets and the findings are valuable. The actual core functionality of it and the efficacy of events are great."
"This solution provides threat prevention and detection of anomalies automatically and investigates the activity of each one of them."
"The user interface is responsive and quite intuitive; when selecting an object it automatically shows the relevant actions."
"The ability to integrate it with Microsoft Azure Sentinel allows us to validate the logs in an even more complex and meaningful way."
"The most valuable feature is the CloudBots for auto-remediation of security findings."
"The solution is very stable and reliable."
"I like CloudLock because when data gets sent out, I do not want it to get out of the environment. In today's world, a lot of users will remotely use the application. It screens all of the sensitive data. That data will really be as part of the environment that you do not want it to be part of. CloudLock is protection for sensitive data."
"The price of this solution should be reduced so that it is more affordable to scale."
"The Check Point Infinity admin portal sometimes freezes."
"The rules are not well-tuned, and many of them generate false positives or nonsensical results."
"The reporting dashboard responds slowly, which leads to late report compilation."
"I would like to see some AI on the back-end, just to assist with doing analysis and making recommendations."
"Making basic rules is easy, but it's complex if you want to do something a little more nuanced. I've been unable to make some rules that I wanted. I couldn't evaluate some values or parameters of the components I look for. I haven't always been able to assess them."
"You do need to pay extra in order to get better support."
"In general, for the product to be successful, they need to improve security, and configuration detection."
"The solution needs to have better integration capabilities. I have a lot of customers asking about how they can integrate it better."
"The only improvement is that it has to be a bigger part of an end-user device. It should look at how endpoints appear on the EDR rather than creating a separate agent. We have to integrate the source code into the system endpoint and make it an agent."
Earn 20 points
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 60 reviews while CloudLock is ranked 18th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while CloudLock is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CloudLock writes "Screens sensitive data but it should be a bigger part of an end-user device". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Qualys VMDR, whereas CloudLock is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Netskope and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
