We performed a comparison between CloudPassage and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Wiz and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)."Policies are very easy to manage on a day-to-day basis."
"Key features are the Software Vulnerability Assessment and the CSM, which is the configuration check."
"Tech support is helpful."
"There are many features. Its reliability, ease of installation, ease of use, and the richness of the information provided are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of Qualys Container Security is the detailed information in the reports and the remediation. This is done to make sure there are no vulnerabilities."
"It's very configurable to adjust impact to systems."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to run different capabilities with the same agent. With only one agent, we can have EDR, vulnerability management, compliance and some basic SaaS security capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is automation."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"The most valuable features of Qualys VM are its ability to do proper vulnerability assessment. It has a lot of updates for all the vulnerability databases from all over the globe. It's an amazing solution when it comes to the versatility of the features it has. Additionally, the reports are very good. It generates very detailed reports about the vulnerabilities inside the environment"
"Of all the advertised functions, I only find two things that really work in my environment, even though I wanted to use all of them. They're not flexible enough to be used."
"In the CSM module the policies are really hard to work with it. It is not very flexible at all. I would suggest that they change that. Right now, the scan is based on the group that the server is in. What happens if the server is in multiple groups?"
"Anything outside of the software vulnerability management and the CSM, things like the GhostPort, need some improvement. The dashboard is in beta. It looks really good, I wish it would come out of beta."
"The reports and graphs are unintuitive."
"The ability to manage user accounts and give rights to the operator to know about abnormalities of applications is something that needs improvement."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"When you want to cover yourself for scalability, you will be charged for the number you place on the scan itself."
"Qualys VM's vulnerability scan could be improved, especially the number of CVE numbers it can manage at a time."
"One of the biggest issues from the clients' perspective is that all Qualys computing is on the cloud."
"The IoT scan is not great."
"Some of the older features could be polished instead of focusing on releasing new features."
"It's too early for me to say if there is any room for improvement since we're in the first couple of months of using this solution."
Earn 20 points
CloudPassage is ranked 41st in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 76 reviews. CloudPassage is rated 8.0, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CloudPassage writes "CloudPassage has a bunch of features. Be sure you understand all of them and how to extract value to your organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". CloudPassage is most compared with , whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.