We compared Druva Phoenix and Rubrik Go across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Druva Phoenix is commended for its user-friendly login portal and overall adaptability. Rubrik Go is highly regarded for its impressive data visualization capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Druva Phoenix is not suitable for non-x86 architectures like AIX and cannot be utilized in the cloud for AIX systems. Rubrik Go needs to address its expensive pricing and improve security visibility.
Service and Support: Druva Phoenix's technical support is exceptional, promptly resolving problems with efficiency. Rubrik Go's support is recognized for its timely and effective resolution of customer issues.
Ease of Deployment: Druva Phoenix offers a quick and easy setup, enabling immediate data backup in a lab environment. Rubrik Go is straightforward to set up and can be installed in just one day.
Pricing: Druva Phoenix's pricing includes cloud data storage, eliminating the need for separate billing. Druva Phoenix's simple and clear pricing model is based on the amount of data and the number of virtual machines being backed up. Rubrik Go is known for its higher pricing, which is charged on a monthly basis.
ROI: There is no available information or user feedback regarding the ROI of Druva Phoenix. It is advised to refer to official sources or directly reach out to the companies for accurate details on user ROI. Rubrik Go offers a varying return. To obtain detailed insights, refer to user feedback or reach out to the respective providers.
Comparison Results: Druva Phoenix provides a fast and effortless setup process and solid compatibility with x86 platforms. Users like Druva’s all-inclusive pricing that eliminates the need for separate billing for data storage. However, it is not compatible with non-x86 architectures and cannot be deployed in the cloud for AIX systems. Rubrik Go stands out for its solid support and exceptional data visualization capabilities. Users say Rubrik Go needs to address its high cost and improve security visibility.
"Once you set it up and you tell it exactly what needs to be backed up, you literally forget about it. It sends you emails and notifications of the current status of the jobs."
"The most valuable features of Druva Phoenix are the simple portal to log in and flexibility."
"I would definitively say that we have been able to make our people more productive by at least 30%."
"Druva Phoenix is easy to use and easy to start with."
"I found the cost-effectiveness of Druva Phoenix to be its most valuable feature, especially when compared to on-premises backup solutions."
"We use the solution as a backup for our virtual environment and SQL databases."
"Rubrik Go is very simple to use."
"Rubrik Go's best feature is data visualization."
"The solution is easy to install; our team just has to put together the plan, give it to IT and let them handle it. Other solutions are quite complex, but this is much simpler."
"Even though the data is already in the cloud, it's an AWS, so by accessing the on-prem appliance you can still search because it is indexed from that appliance."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use for backing up VMs."
"The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good."
"In terms of stability, the product is good."
"Druva Phoenix is optimized to work with x86 platforms, making it unsuitable for backing up non-x86 architectures like AIX. The solution is primarily designed for physical Linux and Windows systems based on the x86 architecture, as well as virtualized Windows and Linux environments. However, if you have an AIX system, it cannot be deployed in the cloud, and therefore, backing it up in the cloud is not a concern."
"There is room for improvement in the reporting aspect of Druva Phoenix."
"Druva Phoenix should include a few reporting features that it doesn't provide currently."
"They were able to give us a very reasonable price considering we were non-for-profit organizations, however, there is always room for improvement on that cost."
"Reporting could be improved. For now, it's only exported to CSB files."
"The tool's pricing needs to be improved."
"If you were to compare it to, say, EMC, the availability of the documentation, training programs, and end-user education aren't as good. Rubrik could improve this."
"You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go."
"Rubrik Go's security visibility could be improved."
"I believe there's room for improvement in terms of support, particularly with Tier 3 support coming from the on-call team."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."
Druva Phoenix is ranked 12th in SaaS Backup with 5 reviews while Rubrik Go is ranked 8th in SaaS Backup with 10 reviews. Druva Phoenix is rated 8.8, while Rubrik Go is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Druva Phoenix writes "Cost-effective and has excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Robust ransomware protection, scalability, and suitability for enterprise environments makes it a top choice for data management needs". Druva Phoenix is most compared with Azure Backup, Druva inSync, Veeam Backup & Replication, AWS Backup and Zerto, whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with AWS Backup, Commvault Cloud and Own Backup and Recovery. See our Druva Phoenix vs. Rubrik Go report.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
