CloverETL vs Fivetran comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Javlin Logo
284 views|239 comparisons
Fivetran Logo
4,380 views|2,957 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Fivetran based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"No dependence on native language and ease of use.​​""Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility.""Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages.""Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

More CloverETL Pros →

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering.""The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available.""Its arrays are powerful enough to handle migrations even when the replication is happening in the background, without causing any trouble with the ongoing traffic.""The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it.""The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature.""The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues.""You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when.""The most important feature of the solution is its ability to build data pipelines in less time."

More Fivetran Pros →

Cons
"​Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough.​""Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server.""Its documentation could be improved.​"

More CloverETL Cons →

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure.""Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs.""More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals.""The connections with SAP must be improved.""We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool.""There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution.""I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies.""HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

More Fivetran Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."
  • "I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."
  • "Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."
  • "I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."
  • "In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."
  • "I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."
  • "The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."
  • "The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."
  • More Fivetran Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become some… more »
    Top Answer: I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can… more »
    Top Answer:As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Software… more »
    Ranking
    57th
    out of 94 in Data Integration
    Views
    284
    Comparisons
    239
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    13th
    out of 94 in Data Integration
    Views
    4,380
    Comparisons
    2,957
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    603
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

    Fivetran is a data integration and migration solution that centralizes data from various sources into a data warehouse (such as Snowflake or BigQuery) for analytics. Its most valuable features include replication and managed pipelines, integration with DBT for data transformation, and many source connections. 

    Fivetran is easy to use, with fast data migration and an intuitive portal for easy setup and troubleshooting. It has helped organizations integrate and manage data, saving time and resources.

    Sample Customers
    IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
    DocuSign, Oldcastle Infrastructure, Crossmedia, Talkdesk, Chubbies, Brandwatch
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Performing Arts11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company45%
    Outsourcing Company18%
    Transportation Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloverETL is ranked 57th in Data Integration while Fivetran is ranked 13th in Data Integration with 19 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Fivetran is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fivetran writes "Solution reduces time-to-value; high ROI". CloverETL is most compared with Talend Open Studio, iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas Fivetran is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate.

    See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.