We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"In our DW/BI solution, ODI is the main tool to integrate the data in a daily batch way."
"One of the standout features of ODI is its ability to prepare everything on a vertical level and create reusable components, which adds to its value."
"The CAEM is very useful in its modularity and portability."
"All our systems can be widely integrated by ODI, such as transactional systems, our data warehouses, and B2B integration."
"The initial setup is easy."
"ODI's best features are customization, integration with other versioning tools, and the ability to define new knowledge modules."
"It has the ability to easily load slowly changing dimensions."
"I like that Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) has a straightforward setup and offers good technical support."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"An area for improvement would be the lack of SQL compatibility - ODI has no ability to interact with SQL unstructured types and data types."
"If there was an add-on tool to hide the performance issues and solve them for me, then I might be interested in that as it would provide me value."
"Technical Support could be better."
"I rate it a seven out of 10 because there is room for growth because ODI is still new, in comparison to Informatica, which is a mature product."
"I would only point out some minor bugs or glitches in the development interface (ODI studio)."
"There are certain things where it can be improved. Initial solution setup seems a bit complex at the start, it should be improved because it becomes bit tough for a novice to get started on this. Sometimes error description is not helpful to understand the problem it gives some generic type of errors which are at times not that helpful to understand the underlying root cause of the issue."
"It needs easier security."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.