We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"The dashboard provided by Oracle Integration Cloud for monitoring and error handling is very intuitive."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"People are able to scale up, learn it quickly, and start delivering."
"The solution is scalable."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"The solution is expensive."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 57th in Data Integration while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". CloverETL is most compared with Talend Open Studio, iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Mule Anypoint Platform, AWS Glue, Oracle GoldenGate and Azure Data Factory.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.