CloverETL vs SAS Data Integration Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Javlin Logo
287 views|245 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SAS Logo
1,073 views|969 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and SAS Data Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility.""Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages.""Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use.""No dependence on native language and ease of use.​​"

More CloverETL Pros →

"The solution is very stable.""The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading.""The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling."

More SAS Data Integration Server Pros →

Cons
"Its documentation could be improved.​""Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server.""​Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough.​"

More CloverETL Cons →

"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible.""So I would like to see improved integration with other software.""The initial setup of SAS Data Integration Server was complex."

More SAS Data Integration Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling.
Top Answer:I don't handle the cost and budget part. From the tool's perspective, I can say that it is an amazing product.
Top Answer:Visualization is an area with a few shortcomings in the product. Some new and amazing visualization capabilities have been added to the product, but I haven't used them enough to be able to comment on… more »
Ranking
60th
out of 100 in Data Integration
Views
287
Comparisons
245
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
34th
out of 100 in Data Integration
Views
1,073
Comparisons
969
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
589
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SAS Enterprise Data Integration Server, Enterprise Data Integration Server
Learn More
Overview
CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.
SAS Data Integration Server is a powerful, configurable and comprehensive solution that can meet a wide variety of data integration requirements, from small tactical projects to strategic business initiatives. It can access virtually all data sources, support data warehousing, migration, synchronization, federation and provisioning initiatives. It can support both batch-oriented and real-time master data management solutions. It can create reusable data integration services in support of service-oriented architectures and data governance and extract, cleanse, transform, conform, aggregate, load and manage data.
Sample Customers
IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA
Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm24%
Government12%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Data Integration
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while SAS Data Integration Server is ranked 34th in Data Integration with 3 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while SAS Data Integration Server is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Data Integration Server writes "A stable and scalable tool with data handling capabilities and an amazing technical support". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas SAS Data Integration Server is most compared with Palantir Foundry, SSIS, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.