We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"The solution is very fast and succinct."
"Speeds up root cause analysis and can help identify issues that your organization never realized were occurring."
"It is the best tool if you have a complex environment or if data ingestion is too huge."
"What is nice about the solution is that it makes it easy to build the queries, search for the events and then do analysis."
"To get visibility from your network devices, servers, and security devices is a great feature."
"We can automatically suspend or terminate suspicious sessions."
"Out-of-the-box, it seems very powerful."
"We used it to create a custom anomaly detection data model to monitor the activity of our back-end services on an hourly basis relative to the past three months of activity."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"The difficult part is related to integration with sources of data that are used to create the logs as this depends on the infrastructure of the client."
"I would like to see more SIEM functionality and a better ticket tool."
"If you monitor too much, you can lose performance on your systems."
"Its pricing is extremely high. There are other tools out in the market that are competitive. They do not necessarily have all the functionality, but they are competitive. The professional services we have used have been high as well in comparison to the market."
"The monitoring aspect of Splunk could be improved. We have to do some queries to get as much information as CrowdStrike or other solutions provide. If you run a big query, you will see a delay. That is the only concern we have because it will take some time if you query large data sets."
"They should make data onboarding easier."
"Splunk can improve its third-party device application plugins."
"We had an instance when Splunk failed and it took us a couple of days to recover."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 2nd in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 227 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic Security.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
