We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Tableau based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the aggregation function."
"The initial setup is quick and easy and you don't need special outside assistance to set everything up."
"The solution allows for the possibility for end-users to do their own reporting."
"The use of a storyboard helps the flow of the data visualisation."
"The best thing I like about Tableau is that you don't have to go for creating; it is calculated free."
"The solution is configurable and flexible. We can customize the dashboards and configure the interface the way that we want. The data can be manipulated and arranged in different ways, such as columns."
"You can create attractive dashboards that inform users using Tableau."
"The solution helps users create dashboards and analyze data without relying on IT or product teams."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"The pricing is a bit expensive."
"The cost of owning the solutions from Tableau is much higher compared to any other analytical solutions."
"When there are millions of records, scaling up is quite difficult."
"It would be nice to include more features on each dashboard."
"The solution could improve the scalability, it is difficult to make changes."
"The data entered into Tableau must be clean. Otherwise, it won't work properly."
"More integration with Python or something related to machine learning would be a good improvement."
"The customization requires a lot of effort and should be simplified. The performance could be better."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 41st in Data Visualization while Tableau is ranked 1st in Data Visualization with 290 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Tableau is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tableau writes "Provides fast data access with in-memory extracts, makes it easy to create visualizations, and saves time". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas Tableau is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, Domo, SAS Visual Analytics and Databricks.
See our list of best Data Visualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
